ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2017
Evaluation of Rv0220, Rv2958c, Rv2994 and Rv3347c of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for serodiagnosis of tuberculosis.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of biomarkers to detect active tuberculosis.Nature microbiology · 2019Pooled it
- Intracellular pathogen manipulation of ER-phagy: direct receptor targeting and indirect pathway perturbation.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2026Review
- The role of antibodies in tuberculosis diagnosis, prophylaxis and therapy: a review from the ESGMYC study group.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022Review
- A systematic review of potential screening biomarkers for active TB disease.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021Review
- emPAI-assisted strategy enhances screening and assessment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection serological markers.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Article
- Identification of new diagnostic biomarkers for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the potential application in the serodiagnosis of human tuberculosis.Microbial biotechnology · 2018Article
- Evaluation of Rv0220, Rv2958c, Rv2994 and Rv3347c of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for serodiagnosis of tuberculosis.Microbial biotechnology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2017
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB), the leading cause of death among infectious diseases worldwide, is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis). Early accurate diagnosis means earlier prevention, treatment and control of TB. To confirm efficient diagnostic antigens for M. tuberculosis, the serodiagnosis value of four recombinant proteins including Rv0220, Rv2958c, Rv2994 and Rv3347c was evaluated in this study. The specificities and sensitivities of four recombinant proteins were determined based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) by screening sera from smear-positive pulmonary TB patients (n = 92), uninfected individuals (n = 60) and patients with Mycoplasma pneumoniae (n = 32) that potentially cross-react with M. tuberculosis. The ELISAs showed that Rv0220, Rv2958c, Rv2994 and Rv3347c exhibited high specificities and sensitivities in detecting immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody, with 98.3/91.3%, 91.7/85.9%, 93.3/89.1% and 93.3/80.4% respectively. According to the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC of the target proteins was 0.988, 0.969, 0.929 and 0.945 respectively. Western blot was established to evaluate the immunoreactivities of target proteins to mice and human sera. Results demonstrated that Rv0220, Rv2958c, Rv2994 and Rv3347c could specifically recognize TB-positive sera and the sera of mice immunized with the corresponding protein. Thus, Rv0220, Rv2958c, Rv2994 and Rv3347c were valuable potential diagnostic antigens for M. tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.