Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28217891›Full record

Trial reportArthritis care & research2017

Effect of Comprehensive Behavioral and Exercise Intervention on Physical Function and Activity Participation After Total Knee Replacement: A Pilot Randomized Study.

Sara R Piva, Gustavo J Almeida, Alexandra B Gil, Anthony M DiGioia, Diane L Helsel, Gwendolyn A Sowa

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis care & research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Physical activity after total joint arthroplasty: a narrative review.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara R PivaUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Gustavo J AlmeidaUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alexandra B GilUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Anthony M DiGioiaUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Diane L HelselUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Gwendolyn A SowaUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Caterina Rosano · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Individuals with Rheumatoid ArthritisK01HD058035 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PIVA, SARA R. · 2009 to 2013
$642k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD058035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the feasibility of a comprehensive behavioral intervention (CBI) program that combines intense exercises with an education program, to be implemented at a later stage (3 months) following total knee replacement (TKR), and to get a first impression of the effects of the CBI as compared to a standard of care exercise (SCE) program on the outcomes of physical function and physical activity.

methodsA total of 44 subjects participated in a 3-month program of either CBI or SCE, followed by 3 months of a home exercise program. Outcomes of physical function and physical activity were measured at baseline and at 6-month followup. Analysis of variance was used to compare statistical differences between groups, whereas responder analyses were used for clinically important differences.

resultsThe CBI was found to be safe and well tolerated. As compared to the SCE group, the CBI group had less pain (P = 0.035) and better physical function based on the Short Form 36 health survey (P = 0.017) and the single-leg stance test (P = 0.037). The other outcome measures did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Results from the responder analysis demonstrated that the CBI group had a 36% higher rate of responders in physical function as compared to the SCE group. Also, the CBI group had 23% more responders in the combined domains of physical function and physical activity.

conclusionThe CBI program is feasible and improves physical function and physical activity in patients several months after TKR. Larger pragmatic randomized trials are needed to confirm the results of this study.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneePatient Education as TopicAgedBehavior TherapyBiomechanical PhenomenaExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth StatusHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvania

Identifiers

PMID28217891
PMCPMC5563278
OpenAlexW2588543639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.