ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2017
Grounded and embodied mathematical cognition: Promoting mathematical insight and proof using action and language.
Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Promoting Mathematics Learning in Young Children Through the Use of Embodied Mathematics Teaching Modules.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Meaning-Events: The Sensorimotor Foundation for Lifespan Development of Meaning.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Differences in characteristics of two aspects of procedural learning in action video game players.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Beyond the left-right brain divide: a framework for dual-domain cognitive fluency.Frontiers in cognition · 2026Article
- An information-theoretic foreshadowing of mathematicians' sudden insights.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Action Predictions Facilitate Embodied Geometric Reasoning.Cognitive science · 2025Article
- How do students reason about statistical sampling with computer simulations? An integrative review from a grounded cognition perspective.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024Review
- Improving middle school students' geometry problem solving ability through hands-on experience: An fNIRS study.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- How can transforming representation of mathematical entities help us employ more cognitive resources?Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The roles of motion, gesture, and embodied action in the processing of mathematical concepts.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Exploring Differences in Student Learning and Behavior Between Real-life and Virtual Reality Chemistry Laboratories.Journal of science education and technology · 2021Article
- Embodied Learning: Why at School the Mind Needs the Body.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- Embodied cognition and STEM learning: overview of a topical collection in CR:PI.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2017Article
- The Impacts of Three Educational Technologies on Algebraic Understanding in the Context of COVID-19.AERA openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We develop a theory of grounded and embodied mathematical cognition (GEMC) that draws on action-cognition transduction for advancing understanding of how the body can support mathematical reasoning. GEMC proposes that participants' actions serve as inputs capable of driving the cognition-action system toward associated cognitive states. This occurs through a process of transduction that promotes valuable mathematical insights by eliciting dynamic depictive gestures that enact spatio-temporal properties of mathematical entities. Our focus here is on pre-college geometry proof production. GEMC suggests that action alone can foster insight but is insufficient for valid proof production if action is not coordinated with language systems for propositionalizing general properties of objects and space. GEMC guides the design of a video game-based learning environment intended to promote students' mathematical insights and informal proofs by eliciting dynamic gestures through in-game directed actions. GEMC generates several hypotheses that contribute to theories of embodied cognition and to the design of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education interventions. Pilot study results with a prototype video game tentatively support theory-based predictions regarding the role of dynamic gestures for fostering insight and proof-with-insight, and for the role of action coupled with language to promote proof-with-insight. But the pilot yields mixed results for deriving in-game interventions intended to elicit dynamic gesture production. Although our central purpose is an explication of GEMC theory and the role of action-cognition transduction, the theory-based video game design reveals the potential of GEMC to improve STEM education, and highlights the complex challenges of connecting embodiment research to education practices and learning environment design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.