Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28217700›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2017

The multiple antibacterial activities of the bladder epithelium.

Jianxuan Wu, Yuxuan Miao, Soman N Abraham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The immune mechanisms of the urinary tract against infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Mechanisms by Which the Intratumoral Microbiome May Potentiate Immunotherapy Response.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nociceptor Neurons are Involved in the Host Response toJournal of inflammation research · 2022
    Article
  13. The immune responses to differentFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Local induction of bladder Th1 responses to combat urinary tract infections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Introducing a novel experimental model of bladder transplantation in mice.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
  19. A highly polarized TNature immunology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianxuan WuDepartment of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Yuxuan MiaoDepartment of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Soman N AbrahamDepartment of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA;; Department of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA;; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA;; Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The urinary tract is subject to frequent challenges from the gut microflora. Indeed, up to 40% of women will experience at least one urinary tract infection (UTI) during their lifetime. Uropathogenic

Indexed as

antibacterial activitiesbladder epithelial cells (BECs)Urinary tract infections (UTIs)

Identifiers

PMID28217700
PMCPMC5300852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.