Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28217600›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care

Primary care hypnotic and anxiolytic prescription: Reviewing prescribing practice over 8 years.

Lloyd D Hughes, Neil Raitt, Muhammed Awais Riaz, Sarah-Jane Baldwin, Kay Erskine, Gail Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lloyd D HughesSenior House Officer, Geriatric & Stroke Medicine, NHS Lothian, United Kingdom.
Neil RaittSpringfield Medical Centre, Arbroath, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Muhammed Awais RiazSpringfield Medical Centre, Arbroath, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Sarah-Jane BaldwinSpringfield Medical Centre, Arbroath, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Kay ErskineSpringfield Medical Centre, Arbroath, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Gail GrahamSpringfield Medical Centre, Arbroath, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver the last few years, hypnotic and anxiolytic medications have had their clinical efficacy questioned in the context of concerns regarding dependence, tolerance alongside other adverse effects. It remains unclear how these concerns have impacted clinical prescribing practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a study reviewing community-dispensed prescribing data for patients on the East Practice Medical Center list in Arbroath, Scotland, in 2007, 2011 and 2015. Anxiolytic and hypnotic medications were defined in accordance with the British National Formulary chapter 4.1.1 and chapter 4.1.2. All patients receiving a drug within this class in any of the study years were collated and anonymized using primary care prescribing data. The patients' age, gender, name of the prescribed drug(s), and total number of prescriptions in this class over the year were extracted.

resultsThe proportion of patients prescribed a benzodiazepine medication decreased between 2007 and 2015: 83.8% ( DISCUSSION: This study reports a reduction in benzodiazepine prescriptions in primary care alongside increases in nonbenzodiazepine and melatonin prescribing, with an increase in prescribing rates of this drug class overall.

conclusionChanges in this prescribing practice may reflect the medicalization of insomnia, local changes in prescribing practice and alongside national recommendations.

Indexed as

Anxiolyticbenzodiazepineshypnoticnonbenzodiazepinesprescribingprimary care

Identifiers

PMID28217600
PMCPMC5290777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.