ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2017
Penile prosthesis implant: scientific advances and technological innovations over the last four decades.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infection rate of penile prosthesis implants in men with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of available evidence.International journal of impotence research · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy, reliability, and patient satisfaction with Rigicon Infla10 X and Infla10 AX inflatable penile prostheses: a retrospective single-center analysis.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education: ChatGPT for Penile Prosthesis Surgery Counseling, a Likert Scale Analysis.Andrology · 2026Article
- Recognition to repair: Managing reservoir complications in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.BJUI compass · 2026Review
- Optimizing cylinder selection in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Penile prosthesis implantation following conservative surgical treatment for penile cancer: anatomical and surgical considerations.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- How to improve functional outcome of inflatable penile implant surgery? a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Preliminary psychometric linguistic validation of the satisfaction survey for inflatable penile implant in Spanish.Sexual medicine · 2025Article
- First time inflatable penile prostheses performed under local anesthesia: a single surgeon series suggests ways to improve both the patient and surgeon experience.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Immediate salvage procedure for infected penile prostheses: A review of the advances in surgical technique and antimicrobial strategies.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Postoperative complication severity prediction in penile prosthesis implantation: a machine learning-based predictive modeling study.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Initial linguistic and cultural validation of the satisfaction survey for inflatable penile implant (SSIPI) in Spanish.Actas urologicas espanolas · 2025Article
- Economic impact of reduced postoperative visits after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- A narrative review on synchronous concurrent versus delayed sequential surgery in the artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis implantation.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Addressing the need for preclinical study of penile prosthesis infection: a new animal model and narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Twisting of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Tubing Leading to Device Malfunction and Required Explantation: A Rare Complication.Case reports in urology · 2024Article
- Implantable Penile Prosthesis for Erectile Dysfunction: Insurance Coverage in the United States.Urology practice · 2023Article
- Analysis of the effects of different surgical approaches on corporotomy localization in inflatable penile implant surgery performed by expert implant surgeons.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Erectile Dysfunction: Treatments, Advances and New Therapeutic Strategies.Brain sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite introduction of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and intracavernosal vasoactive agents, penile prosthesis implant remains a relevant and desired option with sales of penile prostheses continue to stay high, as many men became refractory to medical therapy and/or seeking a more effective and permanent therapy. There are two types of penile prosthesis implants: inflatable and non-inflatable types, and the inflatable penile implants can be subdivided into single-, two- and three-piece devices. Non-inflatable penile prosthesis (non-IPP) may be referred to as semi-rigid rod or malleable prosthesis. IPP is considered a superior option to malleable prosthesis as it produces penile rigidity and flaccidity that closely replicates a normal penile erectile function. Since the introduction of IPP by Scott in 1973, surgical landscape for penile prosthesis implantation has changed dramatically. Advances in prosthesis design, device technologies and surgical techniques have made penile prosthesis implant a more natural, durable and reliable device. The following article reviews the scientific advances and technological innovation in modern penile prosthesis implants over the last four decades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.