Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28217301›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2017

Risk factors for perineal wound infection after abdominoperineal resection of advanced lower rectal cancer.

Takatoshi Nakamura, Takeo Sato, Kazushige Hayakawa, Yoko Takayama, Masanori Naito, Takahiro Yamanashi, Atsuko Tsutsui, Hirohisa Miura, Masahiko Watanabe

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Management of Perineal Wounds Following Pelvic Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takatoshi NakamuraDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan.
Takeo SatoDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan.
Kazushige HayakawaDepartment of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University Hospital, Japan.
Yoko TakayamaDepartment of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan.
Masanori NaitoDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan.
Takahiro YamanashiDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan.
Atsuko TsutsuiDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan.
Hirohisa MiuraDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan.
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan.
Kitasato University · JPKitasato University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAbdominoperineal resection (APR) of advanced lower rectal cancer carries a high incidence of perineal wound infection. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate risk factors for perineal wound infection after APR.

methodsThe study group comprised 154 patients who underwent APR for advanced lower rectal cancer in our department from January 1990 through December 2012. The following 15 variables were studied as potential risk factors for perineal wound infection: sex, age, body-mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, diabetes mellitus, preoperative albumin level, preoperative hemoglobin level, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(NCRT), surgical procedure (open surgery vs. laparoscopic surgery), operation time, bleeding volume, intraoperative transfusion, tumor diameter, invasion depth, and histopathological stage.

resultsAmong the 154 patients, 30 (19%) had perineal wound infection. Univariate analysis showed that a hemoglobin level of ≤11 g/dL (p = 0.001) and NCRT (p = 0.001) were significantly related to perineal wound infection. On multivariate analysis including the preoperative albumin level (≤3.5 g/dL) in addition to the above 2 variables, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) was the only independent risk factor for perineal wound infection. Perineal wound infection developed in 31% of patients who received NCRT, as compared with 10% of patients who did not receive NCRT. The relative risk of perineal infection in the former group was 4.092 as compared with the latter group (p = 0.0002).

conclusionsNCRT is a risk factor for perineal wound infection after APR in patients with advanced lower rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdvancedAPR, Abdominoperineal resectionNCRT, Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyPerineal wound infectionRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID28217301
PMCPMC5302139
OpenAlexW2585825999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.