Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28217137›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Reshaping Plant Biology: Qualitative and Quantitative Descriptors for Plant Morphology.

Mathilde Balduzzi, Brad M Binder, Alexander Bucksch, Cynthia Chang, Lilan Hong, Anjali S Iyer-Pascuzzi, Christophe Pradal, Erin E Sparks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Towards 3D basic theories of plant forms.Communications biology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Statistical Growth Property of Plant Root Architectures.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mathilde BalduzziINRIA, Virtual Plants Montpellier, France.
Brad M BinderDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville Knoxville, TN, USA.
Alexander BuckschDepartment of Plant Biology, University of GeorgiaAthens, GA, USA; Warnell School of Forestry and Environmental Resources, University of GeorgiaAthens, GA, USA; Institute of Bioinformatics, University of GeorgiaAthens, GA, USA.
Cynthia ChangDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Washington-Bothell Bothell, WA, USA.
Lilan HongWeill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology and Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USA.
Anjali S Iyer-PascuzziDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Christophe PradalINRIA, Virtual PlantsMontpellier, France; CIRAD, UMR AGAPMontpellier, France.
Erin E SparksDepartment of Biology, Duke University Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An emerging challenge in plant biology is to develop qualitative and quantitative measures to describe the appearance of plants through the integration of mathematics and biology. A major hurdle in developing these metrics is finding common terminology across fields. In this review, we define approaches for analyzing plant geometry, topology, and shape, and provide examples for how these terms have been and can be applied to plants. In leaf morphological quantifications both geometry and shape have been used to gain insight into leaf function and evolution. For the analysis of cell growth and expansion, we highlight the utility of geometric descriptors for understanding sepal and hypocotyl development. For branched structures, we describe how topology has been applied to quantify root system architecture to lend insight into root function. Lastly, we discuss the importance of using morphological descriptors in ecology to assess how communities interact, function, and respond within different environments. This review aims to provide a basic description of the mathematical principles underlying morphological quantifications.

Indexed as

ecologygeometryhypocotylleafmorphologyrootssepaltopology

Identifiers

PMID28217137
PMCPMC5289971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.