Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28217119›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Seroprevalence, Isolation, Genotyping, and Pathogenicity of

YuRong Yang, YongJie Feng, QiuXia Yao, YingHua Wang, YaoYao Lu, HongDe Liang, XingQuan Zhu, LongXian Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Role ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Seroprevalence and molecular detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Article
  3. First report of viableFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Article
  4. Molecular Prevalence and Genotyping ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Toxoplasmosis in Sheep Caused byAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Low Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Unifying Virulence Evaluation inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Genotypes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

YuRong YangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University Zhengzhou, China.
YongJie FengCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University Zhengzhou, China.
QiuXia YaoState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou, China.
YingHua WangCenter for Animal Disease Control and Prevention of Henan Province Zhengzhou, China.
YaoYao LuCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University Zhengzhou, China.
HongDe LiangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University Zhengzhou, China.
XingQuan ZhuState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou, China.
LongXian ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ChinagenotypeisolationseroepidemiologysheepToxoplasma gondiivirulence

Identifiers

PMID28217119
PMCPMC5289961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.