Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28217113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Antimicrobial and Insecticidal: Cyclic Lipopeptides and Hydrogen Cyanide Produced by Plant-Beneficial

Pascale Flury, Pilar Vesga, Maria Péchy-Tarr, Nora Aellen, Francesca Dennert, Nicolas Hofer, Karent P Kupferschmied, Peter Kupferschmied, Zane Metla, Zongwang Ma and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. ExploringMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Does regulation hold the key to optimizing lipopeptide production inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Pascale FluryPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Pilar VesgaPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Maria Péchy-TarrDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nora AellenPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Francesca DennertPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Nicolas HoferPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Karent P KupferschmiedDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Peter KupferschmiedDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Zane MetlaPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH ZürichZürich, Switzerland; Laboratory of Experimental Entomology, Institute of Biology, University of LatviaRiga, Latvia.
Zongwang MaLaboratory of Phytopathology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Sandra SiegfriedPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Sandra de WeertMicrobial Biotechnology and Health, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Guido BloembergMicrobial Biotechnology and Health, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Monica HöfteLaboratory of Phytopathology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Christoph J KeelDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Monika MaurhoferPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHGhent University · BELeiden University · NLUniversity of Latvia · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particular groups of plant-beneficial fluorescent pseudomonads are not only root colonizers that provide plant disease suppression, but in addition are able to infect and kill insect larvae. The mechanisms by which the bacteria manage to infest this alternative host, to overcome its immune system, and to ultimately kill the insect are still largely unknown. However, the investigation of the few virulence factors discovered so far, points to a highly multifactorial nature of insecticidal activity. Antimicrobial compounds produced by fluorescent pseudomonads are effective weapons against a vast diversity of organisms such as fungi, oomycetes, nematodes, and protozoa. Here, we investigated whether these compounds also contribute to insecticidal activity. We tested mutants of the highly insecticidal strains

Indexed as

Gac regulatory systeminsecticidal activityorfamidePseudomonas chlororaphisPseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas protegenssecondary metabolitessessilin

Identifiers

PMID28217113
PMCPMC5289993
OpenAlexW2584082967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.