ArticleCEUR workshop proceedings2016
OOSTT: a Resource for Analyzing the Organizational Structures of Trauma Centers and Trauma Systems.
Article in CEUR workshop proceedings, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-Related Processes and Challenges at Level I-IV Trauma Centers in Arkansas: Results of a Mixed-Methods Case Study.Journal of registry management · 2025Observational
- The Representational Challenge of Integration and Interoperability in Transformed Health Ecosystems.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Expanding the Ontology of Organizational Structures of Trauma Centers and Trauma Systems.CEUR workshop proceedings · 2024Article
- Assessing the Need for Semantic Data Integration for Surgical Biobanks-A Knowledge Representation Perspective.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- ACS COT participates in study to develop comparative data on trauma care organization.Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons · 2020Article
- Collecting data on organizational structures of trauma centers: the CAFE web service.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2020Article
- Development and Validation of a Controlled Vocabulary: An OWL Representation of Organizational Structures of Trauma Centers and Trauma Systems.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2019Article
- Extending the DIDEO ontology to include entities from the natural product drug interaction domain of discourse.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organizational structures of healthcare organizations has increasingly become a focus of medical research. In the CAFÉ project we aim to provide a web-service enabling ontology-driven comparison of the organizational characteristics of trauma centers and trauma systems. Trauma remains one of the biggest challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Research has demonstrated that coordinated efforts like trauma systems and trauma centers are key components of addressing this challenge. Evaluation and comparison of these organizations is essential. However, this research challenge is frequently compounded by the lack of a shared terminology and the lack of effective information technology solutions for assessing and comparing these organizations. In this paper we present the Ontology of Organizational Structures of Trauma systems and Trauma centers (OOSTT) that provides the ontological foundation to CAFÉ's web-based questionnaire infrastructure. We present the usage of the ontology in relation to the questionnaire and provide the methods that were used to create the ontology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28217041PMC5312685What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.