Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28216968›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2017

Complications and management of forgotten long-term biliary stents.

Se Hoon Sohn, Jae Hyun Park, Kook Hyun Kim, Tae Nyeun Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Outcome of forgotten biliary stents for more than five years-A two-decade experience.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The efficacy and safety ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
  20. Biliary and pancreatic stents.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Se Hoon SohnSe Hoon Sohn, Jae Hyun Park, Kook Hyun Kim, Tae Nyeun Kim, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu 42415, South Korea.
Jae Hyun ParkSe Hoon Sohn, Jae Hyun Park, Kook Hyun Kim, Tae Nyeun Kim, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu 42415, South Korea.
Kook Hyun KimSe Hoon Sohn, Jae Hyun Park, Kook Hyun Kim, Tae Nyeun Kim, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu 42415, South Korea.
Tae Nyeun KimSe Hoon Sohn, Jae Hyun Park, Kook Hyun Kim, Tae Nyeun Kim, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu 42415, South Korea.
Yeungnam University CollegeYeungnam University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate complications and management outcomes of retained long-term plastic biliary stents.

methodsEndoscopic plastic biliary stent placement was performed in 802 patients at Yeungnam University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2014. Follow-up loss with a subsequently forgotten stent for more than 12 mo occurred in 38 patients. We retrospectively examined the cause of biliary stent insertion, status of stents, complications associated with biliary stents and management outcomes of long-term plastic biliary stents. Continuous variables were analyzed using the

resultsMean age of patients was 73.7 ± 12 years and male-to-female ratio was 2.2:1. Indications of plastic biliary stent insertion were bile duct stones (63.2%, 24/38) and benign bile duct stricture (52.6%, 20/38). Mean duration of retained plastic stent was 22.6 ± 12.2 mo, and in 10 cases (26.3%), stents were retained for more than 24 mo. Common bile duct (CBD) stones or sludge were found in most cases (92.1%, 35/38). The most common complication was acute cholangitis (94.7%, 36/38). Stent removal by endoscopic approach was successfully performed in 92.1% (35/38) of the cases. In 3 cases, an additional plastic stent was inserted alongside the previous stent due to failure of the stent removal. Endoscopic removal of bile duct stones was successful in 73.7% (28/38) of the cases. When patients were divided into two groups by duration of stent placement (12 to 24 mo

conclusionThe most common complication of retained long-term plastic biliary stents was acute cholangitis associated with CBD stones. Endoscopic management was successfully performed in most cases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBile DuctsBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresChinaCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangitisCholestasisConstriction, PathologicFemaleGallstonesHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcute cholangitisBiliary stentBiliary stoneForgotten stentsLong-term complications

Identifiers

PMID28216968
PMCPMC5292335
OpenAlexW2576487935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.