Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28216928›Full record

ArticleUrology annals

Spontaneous forniceal rupture: Can it be treated conservatively?

Ahmed Gaber Al-Mujalhem, Mohammed Sayed Ahmed Aziz, Mohammed Farag Sultan, Ahmed Mohammed Al-Maghraby, Mohammed Abdelmonem Al-Shazly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Case Report: Not Your Typical Kidney Stone.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bilateral renal forniceal rupture due to retroperitoneal hematoma after femoral venous access.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed Gaber Al-MujalhemDepartrment of Urology, Mubarak Alkabeer Hospital, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Sayed Ahmed AzizDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Egypt.
Mohammed Farag SultanDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Egypt.
Ahmed Mohammed Al-MaghrabyDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.
Mohammed Abdelmonem Al-ShazlyDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Egypt.
Menoufia University · EGMubarak Al Kabeer Hospital · KWZagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSpontaneous forniceal rupture is one of the possible complications of urolithiasis. The mechanism of forniceal rupture is not well explained in the literature. Most of the cases presented with sudden onset of acute renal colic and diagnosed by noncontrast CT (NCCT). Until now there is no solid consensus about the ideal management of such a condition.

aimTo study indications and validity of conservative management of spontaneous caliceal rupture. SETTINGS AND

designThis is an observational prospective study. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll cases diagnosed as spontaneous forniceal rupture in our departments from 2011 to 2015 were enrolled. All cases were diagnosed with NCCT or CT-Urography.. Non complicated patients were primarily managed conservatively. Intervention (DJ stent insertion, nephrostomy tube insertion, or urgent ureteroscopy) was reserved to complicated cases or solitary kidney. Drainage of urinoma was done in cases with sizable urinoma (more than 100 ml

resultsA total of 40 patients: Twenty eight (70%) patients had normal serum creatinine level at presentation, while 12 (30%) patients had elevated serum creatinine. Twenty three (57.5%) patients were successfully managed conservatively, their mean size of stone was 6.2 ± 2 mm and the hospital stay was 3.1 ± 1.9 days. Eighteen patients (42.5%) underwent interventions. Their stone size was 4.5 ± 2.1 mm and the hospital stay for the interventional group was 4.2 ± 1.8 days. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mann-Whitney test was used for testing difference between means because the data groups are not parametric. Otherwise, simple descriptive statestics were used.

conclusionSpontaneous forniceal rupture is more likely to occur with smaller distal ureteric stones. Conservative management is a valid option in non-complicated cases. Intervention should be reserved to complicated cases or cases with sizable urinoma.

Indexed as

Fornicealrupturestone

Identifiers

PMID28216928
PMCPMC5308037
OpenAlexW2580012126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.