ArticleUrology annals
Spontaneous forniceal rupture: Can it be treated conservatively?
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Spontaneous Bilateral Renal Forniceal Rupture Secondary to Acute Urinary Retention in a Patient with Prior Prostate Radiotherapy: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Spontaneous renal calyceal rupture from distal ureteric tiny stone: a rare case report and literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Rare case of spontaneous renal calyx rupture due to vesicoureteral junction stone in a horseshoe kidney.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive intervention of forniceal rupture in a solitary functioning kidney: A case report.Urology case reports · 2025Article
- Spontaneous renal subcapsular fluid accumulation with hemorrhage due to ureteral stone: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Diminutive Ureteral Stone Causing Caylyceal Rupture: Case Report and a Review of the Treatment Options.Cureus · 2023Article
- Is conservative management safe in patients with acute ureterolithiasis and perirenal stranding?Urolithiasis · 2023Article
- Spontaneus Suburothelial Hemorrhage Associated With Forniceal Rupture and Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage.Cureus · 2022Article
- Spontaneous rupture of the fornix due to a ureteral lithiasis of 3 mm causing a urinoma: report of an original case.Radiology case reports · 2021Article
- Spontaneous urinoma debuting as retroperitoneal abscess: report of 2 cases and literature review.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
- Case Report: Not Your Typical Kidney Stone.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Huge urinoma caused by spontaneous ureteral rupture secondary to ureteral obstruction due to prostate cancer.Asian journal of urology · 2020Article
- Spontaneous bilateral renal pelvis rupture during CT in the absence of urinary tract obstruction: case report.BMC urology · 2020Article
- Bilateral renal forniceal rupture due to retroperitoneal hematoma after femoral venous access.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2020Article
- Spontaneous Large Urinoma Secondary to Obstructing Ureteral Calculus: A Kidney Pop-Off Mechanism.Journal of endourology case reports · 2020Article
- Predictors of forniceal rupture in patients with obstructing ureteral calculi: Analysis of multicenter data.Urology annalsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextSpontaneous forniceal rupture is one of the possible complications of urolithiasis. The mechanism of forniceal rupture is not well explained in the literature. Most of the cases presented with sudden onset of acute renal colic and diagnosed by noncontrast CT (NCCT). Until now there is no solid consensus about the ideal management of such a condition.
aimTo study indications and validity of conservative management of spontaneous caliceal rupture. SETTINGS AND
designThis is an observational prospective study. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll cases diagnosed as spontaneous forniceal rupture in our departments from 2011 to 2015 were enrolled. All cases were diagnosed with NCCT or CT-Urography.. Non complicated patients were primarily managed conservatively. Intervention (DJ stent insertion, nephrostomy tube insertion, or urgent ureteroscopy) was reserved to complicated cases or solitary kidney. Drainage of urinoma was done in cases with sizable urinoma (more than 100 ml
resultsA total of 40 patients: Twenty eight (70%) patients had normal serum creatinine level at presentation, while 12 (30%) patients had elevated serum creatinine. Twenty three (57.5%) patients were successfully managed conservatively, their mean size of stone was 6.2 ± 2 mm and the hospital stay was 3.1 ± 1.9 days. Eighteen patients (42.5%) underwent interventions. Their stone size was 4.5 ± 2.1 mm and the hospital stay for the interventional group was 4.2 ± 1.8 days. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mann-Whitney test was used for testing difference between means because the data groups are not parametric. Otherwise, simple descriptive statestics were used.
conclusionSpontaneous forniceal rupture is more likely to occur with smaller distal ureteric stones. Conservative management is a valid option in non-complicated cases. Intervention should be reserved to complicated cases or cases with sizable urinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.