Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28216092›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2018

Health care professionals' perceptions of a community based 'virtual ward' medicines management service: A qualitative study.

Andrew Kirkcaldy, Barbara A Jack, Louise C Cope

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Barriers and facilitators to the use of virtual wards: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Yonder: Virtual wards, gout, scalp cooling, and mosques.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew KirkcaldyEvidence-based Practice Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 4QP, UK.
Barbara A JackEvidence-based Practice Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 4QP, UK. Electronic address: Jackb@edgehill.ac.uk.
Louise C CopeEvidence-based Practice Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 4QP, UK. Electronic address: copel@edgehill.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes a qualitative research study using focus groups to explore the views and experiences of a medicines management team (MMT) on the service they deliver within a 'Virtual Ward' (VW); and those of the wider multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals on the service provided by the MMT. Several themes emerged from the focus groups, including impact on patients and carers, team working and issues and challenges. A dedicated MMT was seen as a positive contribution to the VW, which potentially increased the quality of patient care, and appeared to be a positive experience for both the MM and wider multidisciplinary team.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDelivery of Health CareFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMedication Therapy ManagementPatient Care TeamPerceptionQualitative ResearchQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.