Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28215963›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2017

Racial and ethnic variations in one-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction.

Nicholas L Berlin, Adeyiza O Momoh, Ji Qi, Jennifer B Hamill, Hyungjin M Kim, Andrea L Pusic, Edwin G Wilkins

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Postoperative Outcomes After Breast Reduction: Do Racial Disparities Exist?Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Breast Reconstruction in De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: reducing the disparity through educational outreach to the underserved.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas L BerlinSection of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Adeyiza O MomohCenter for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ji QiSection of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jennifer B HamillSection of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Hyungjin M KimCenter for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Andrea L PusicDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Edwin G WilkinsSection of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: ewilkins@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

The National Person-Centered Assessment Resource (PCAR)U2CCA186878 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GERSHON, RICHARD · 2014 to 2018
$11.9M
Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcome Consortium (MROC Study)R01CA152192 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PUSIC, ANDREA LOUISE, WILKINS, EDWIN G. · 2011 to 2015
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152192NCI NIH HHS U2C CA186878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting studies evaluating racial and ethnic disparities focus on describing differences in procedure type and the proportion of women who undergo reconstruction following mastectomy. This study seeks to examine racial and ethnic variations in clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following breast reconstruction.

methodsThe Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium is an 11 center, prospective cohort study collecting clinical and PROs following autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction. Mixed-effects regression models, weighted to adjust for non-response, were performed to evaluate outcomes at one-year postoperatively.

resultsThe cohort included 2703 women who underwent breast reconstruction. In multivariable models, Hispanic or Latina patients were less likely to experience any complications and major complications. Black or African-American women reported greater improvements in psychosocial and sexual well-being.

conclusionsDespite differences in pertinent clinical and socioeconomic variables, racial and ethnic minorities experienced equivalent or better outcomes. These findings provide reassurance in the context of numerous racial and ethnic health disparities and build upon our understanding of the delivery of surgical care to women with or at risk for developing breast cancer.

Indexed as

MammaplastyRacial GroupsBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerBreast reconstructionOutcomes researchPatient-reported outcomesPublic healthSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID28215963
PMCPMC5533638
OpenAlexW2587294735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.