Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28215389›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2017

Dissemination and Implementation Science Training Needs: Insights From Practitioners and Researchers.

Rachel G Tabak, Margaret M Padek, Jon F Kerner, Kurt C Stange, Enola K Proctor, Maureen J Dobbins, Graham A Colditz, David A Chambers, Ross C Brownson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel G TabakPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: rtabak@wustl.edu.
Margaret M PadekPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jon F KernerCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kurt C StangeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Enola K ProctorGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Maureen J DobbinsSchool of Nursing, National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
David A ChambersDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions to Control CancerR01CA160327 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2012 to 2017
$2.8M
Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implemention Research in CancerR25CA171994 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160327NCI NIH HHS R25 CA171994NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDissemination and implementation research training has great potential to improve the impact and reach of health-related research; however, research training needs from the end user perspective are unknown. This paper identifies and prioritizes dissemination and implementation research training needs.

methodsA diverse sample of researchers, practitioners, and policymakers was invited to participate in Concept Mapping in 2014-2015. Phase 1 (Brainstorming) gathered participants' responses to the prompt: To improve the impact of research evidence in practice and policy settings, a skill in which researchers need more training is… The resulting statement list was edited and included subsequent phases. Phase 2 (Sorting) asked participants to sort each statement into conceptual piles. In Phase 3 (Rating), participants rated the difficulty and importance of incorporating each statement into a training curriculum. A multidisciplinary team synthesized and interpreted the results in 2015-2016.

resultsDuring Brainstorming, 60 researchers and 60 practitioners/policymakers contributed 274 unique statements. Twenty-nine researchers and 16 practitioners completed sorting and rating. Nine concept clusters were identified: Communicating Research Findings, Improve Practice Partnerships, Make Research More Relevant, Strengthen Communication Skills, Develop Research Methods and Measures, Consider and Enhance Fit, Build Capacity for Research, and Understand Multilevel Context. Though researchers and practitioners had high agreement about importance (r =0.93) and difficulty (r =0.80), ratings differed for several clusters (e.g., Build Capacity for Research).

conclusionsIncluding researcher and practitioner perspectives in competency development for dissemination and implementation research identifies skills and capacities needed to conduct and communicate contextualized, meaningful, and relevant research.

Indexed as

Health Plan ImplementationInformation DisseminationPublic Health PracticeCluster AnalysisResearch

Identifiers

PMID28215389
PMCPMC5321656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.