Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28215119›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release.

Antje Ihlefeld, Yi-Wen Chen, Dan H Sanes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The cingulate cortex facilitates auditory perception under challenging listening conditions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Developmental hearing loss-induced perceptual deficits are rescued by genetic restoration of cortical inhibition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Auditory Deprivation during Development Alters Efferent Neural Feedback and Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Early-Life Stress Impairs Perception and Neural Encoding of Rapid Signals in the Auditory Pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparative medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Preserving Inhibition during Developmental Hearing Loss Rescues Auditory Learning and Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Quantifying Neuronal Information Flow in Response to Frequency and Intensity Changes in the Auditory Cortex.Conference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Brief Stimulus Exposure Fully Remediates Temporal Processing Deficits Induced by Early Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antje Ihlefeld1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
Yi-Wen Chen2 Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY, USA.
Dan H Sanes2 Center for Neural Science, New York University, NY, USA.
New York University · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Long-lasting deficits induced by transient developmental hearing lossR01DC014656 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, DAN HARVEY, SEMPLE, MALCOLM N. · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
The role of sound deprivation on central processing of maskingR03DC014008 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI IHLEFELD, ANTJE · 2014 to 2016
$466k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014656NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC014008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing-impaired individuals experience difficulties in detecting or understanding speech, especially in background sounds within the same frequency range. However, normally hearing (NH) human listeners experience less difficulty detecting a target tone in background noise when the envelope of that noise is temporally gated (modulated) than when that envelope is flat across time (unmodulated). This perceptual benefit is called modulation masking release (MMR). When flanking masker energy is added well outside the frequency band of the target, and comodulated with the original modulated masker, detection thresholds improve further (MMR+). In contrast, if the flanking masker is antimodulated with the original masker, thresholds worsen (MMR-). These interactions across disparate frequency ranges are thought to require central nervous system (CNS) processing. Therefore, we explored the effect of developmental conductive hearing loss (CHL) in gerbils on MMR characteristics, as a test for putative CNS mechanisms. The detection thresholds of NH gerbils were lower in modulated noise, when compared with unmodulated noise. The addition of a comodulated flanker further improved performance, whereas an antimodulated flanker worsened performance. However, for CHL-reared gerbils, all three forms of masking release were reduced when compared with NH animals. These results suggest that developmental CHL impairs both within- and across-frequency processing and provide behavioral evidence that CNS mechanisms are affected by a peripheral hearing impairment.

Indexed as

Auditory ThresholdHearing Loss, ConductivePerceptual MaskingHearingHumansNoisecomodulation masking releaseconductive hearing lossdeafnessgerbilsperceptual maskingsensory deprivation

Identifiers

PMID28215119
PMCPMC5318943
OpenAlexW2590510340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.