Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28214977›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2017

BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Optimal Strategy for Treatment?

Romain Cohen, Pascale Cervera, Magali Svrcek, Anna Pellat, Chantal Dreyer, Aimery de Gramont, Thierry André

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Safety and efficacy of encorafenib-cetuximab combination inESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phenotype-Genotype Correlation in Colorectal Cancer: A Real-Life Study.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Journal of oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Romain CohenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Pascale CerveraDepartment of Pathology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Magali SvrcekDepartment of Pathology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Anna PellatDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Chantal DreyerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Aimery de GramontDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, 4 rue Kléber, 92300, Levallois-Perret, France.
Thierry AndréDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France. thierry.andre@aphp.fr.
Hôpital Saint-Antoine · FRGERCOR (France) · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe BRAF activating mutation, harbored by approximately 10% of colorectal cancers (CRC), confers dramatic prognosis to advanced diseases. In early-stage setting, the identification of the BRAF mutation does not impact the therapeutic decision. Yet, the BRAF mutation could be considered as a stratification factor in adjuvant trials, because of its prognostic impact after relapse. Moreover, both BRAF mutation and mismatch repair (MMR) statuses should be determined in all CRC to help identify sporadic tumors versus Lynch syndrome-related tumors. Indeed, in patients with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors and MLH1 loss of expression, the BRAFV600E mutation indicates a sporadic origin. In advanced BRAF-mutated CRC, the standard of care remains fluoropyrimidine-based cytotoxic regimen in combination with bevacizumab. Although a recent meta-analysis showed that there was insufficient data to justify the exclusion of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, antiangiogenic agents should be preferred in the first-line setting. Despite the lack of a randomized phase 3 study dedicated to BRAF-mutated CRC, chemotherapy intensification combining a quadruple association of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI), and bevacizumab seems like a valid option. Although first results with BRAF inhibitors as single agents in BRAF-mutated CRC were disappointing, their association with therapies targeting the MAPK pathway seems to overcome the primary resistance to BRAF inhibition. In the field of sporadic CRC, the BRAF mutation is strongly associated with MMR deficiency. Considering breakthrough results of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR repair tumors, determination of the MMR status appears to be mandatory. Given the dramatic prognosis conferred by the BRAF mutation, patients with BRAF-mutated advanced CRC need to be systematically identified and proposed for clinical trial enrolment in order to benefit from innovative therapies.

Indexed as

MutationAmino Acid SubstitutionCodonColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDNA Mismatch RepairGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafCodonProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAFV600ECheckpoint inhibitorColorectal cancerDabrafenibFOLFOXIRIMicrosatellite instabilityVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID28214977
OpenAlexW2588601193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.