Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2017
Comparison of mesh fixation and non-fixation in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.
Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Mesh Fixation With Tackers to Use of Self Fixating Mesh in Total Extra Peritoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Is it Necessary to Fix Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair; Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Study
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mesh fixation versus non-fixation in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of RCTs on the safety of non-fixation of mesh in TAPP inguinal hernia repair: an updated meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of mesh non-fixation in patients undergoing laparo-endoscopic repair of groin hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Fixation versus no fixation in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of primary inguinal hernia-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Assessment of mesh displacement following laparoscopic enhanced view totally extraperitoneal technique: comparing mesh fixation and non-fixation in difficult inguinal hernias.Updates in surgery · 2026Trial
- Comparison of mesh fixation and non-fixation in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized control trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Comparison of anatomical polyester mesh without fixation and conventional flat mesh with fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Safety of unfixed mesh in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgery open science · 2023Article
- Prospective, multicenter, pairwise analysis of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: early results from the Prospective Hernia Study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020Article
- Transfascial suture fixation technique in laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia.Asian journal of endoscopic surgery · 2020Article
- Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with or without fixation leads to similar results. Outcome of randomized prospective trial.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020Article
- Comparison of short- to mid-term efficacy of nonfixation and permanent tack fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair procedures with or without mesh fixation for non-recurrent inguinal hernia.
methods100 male patients with non-recurrent inguinal hernia (62 unilateral and 38 bilateral) were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to either the mesh fixation group (n = 50) or the mesh non-fixation group (n = 50). The operative and follow-up data of the two groups were analyzed and compared in terms of recurrence rates, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and postoperative changes in testicular arterial blood flow.
resultsPain scores were significantly higher in the mesh fixation group prior to discharge and at the 1st postoperative month (p = 0.034 and 0.001, respectively). Necessity to use narcotic analgesics was higher in the fixation group prior to discharge (p = 0.025). Urinary retention was significantly more frequent in the fixation group than in the non-fixation group. (p = 0.007). The mean operative time and length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of testicular arterial blood flow showed a substantial but not statistically significant difference for the frequency of impairment (14.2% in the fixation group and 5.8% in the non-fixation group) (p = 0.176). At long-term follow-up, no recurrence and no nerve injury were determined.
conclusionFixation of the mesh to the abdominal wall has been associated with various postoperative complications for no additional benefit in lowering recurrence rates. For non-recurrent inguinal hernia, non-fixation of the mesh is safe and reliable. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary for subgroup analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.