Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28213783›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2017

High PTEN gene expression is a negative prognostic marker in human primary breast cancers with preserved p53 function.

Synnøve Yndestad, Eilin Austreid, Stian Knappskog, Ranjan Chrisanthar, Peer Kåre Lilleng, Per Eystein Lønning, Hans Petter Eikesdal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cancers · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Complex Landscape ofCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Role of lncRNA PTENP1 in tumorigenesis and progression of bladder cancer and the molecular mechanism].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Synnøve YndestadSection of Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Eilin AustreidSection of Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Stian KnappskogSection of Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ranjan ChrisantharSection of Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Peer Kåre LillengDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Per Eystein LønningSection of Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Hans Petter EikesdalSection of Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. hans.eikesdal@k2.uib.no.
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePTEN is an important tumor suppressor in breast cancer. Here, we examined the prognostic and predictive value of PTEN and PTEN pseudogene (PTENP1) gene expression in patients with locally advanced breast cancer given neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsThe association between pretreatment PTEN and PTENP1 gene expression, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and recurrence-free and disease-specific survival was assessed in 364 patients with locally advanced breast cancer given doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin, or epirubicin versus paclitaxel in three phase II prospective studies. Further, protein expression of PTEN or phosphorylated Akt, S6 kinase, and 4EBP1 was assessed in a subgroup of 187 tumors.

resultsNeither PTEN nor PTENP1 gene expression level predicted response to any of the chemotherapy regimens tested (n = 317). Among patients without distant metastases (n = 282), a high pretreatment PTEN mRNA level was associated with inferior relapse-free (RFS; p = 0.001) and disease-specific survival (DSS; p = 0.003). Notably, this association was limited to patients harboring TP53 wild-type tumors (RFS; p = 0.003, DSS; p = 0.009). PTEN mRNA correlated significantly with PTENP1 mRNA levels (r

conclusionHigh intratumoral PTEN gene expression was associated with poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced breast cancers harboring wild-type TP53.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisPTEN PhosphohydrolaseSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomePTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Locally advanced breast cancerp53Predictive factorsPrognosisPTEN

Identifiers

PMID28213783
PMCPMC5387035
OpenAlexW2588168380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.