ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2017
Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Efficacy of Colchicine in Reducing NT-proBNP, Caspase-1, TGF-β, and Galectin-3 Expression and Improving Echocardiography Parameters in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Suxiao Jiuxin Pill protects cardiomyocytes against mitochondrial injury and alters gene expression during ischemic injury.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis study aims to determine if percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does improve survival in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). RECENT
findingsThe International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial will evaluate patients with moderate to severe ischemia and will be the largest randomized trial of an initial management strategy of coronary revascularization (percutaneous or surgical) versus optimal medical therapy alone for SIHD. Although the ISCHEMIA trial may show a benefit with upfront coronary revascularization in this high-risk population, cardiac events after PCI are largely caused by plaque rupture in segments outside of the original stented segment. Furthermore, given the robust data from prior randomized trials, which showed no survival benefit with PCI, and the likelihood that the highest risk patients in ISCHEMIA will be treated with surgery, it is unlikely that the ISCHEMIA trial will show a survival benefit particular to PCI. RECENT
findingsAlthough PCI relieves symptoms, the evidence base indicates that it does not prolong survival in SIHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.