Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28213602›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Understanding the epidemiology of avoidable significant harm in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Brian G Bell, Stephen Campbell, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Huw Prosser Evans, Alison Cooper, Christina Sheehan, Sarah Rodgers, Christine Johnson, Adrian Edwards, Sarah Armstrong and 9 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. General practice follow-up after hospital discharge in older adults: retrospective record analysis in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Brian G BellDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Stephen CampbellNIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrew Carson-StevensDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Huw Prosser EvansDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Alison CooperDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Christina SheehanDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Sarah RodgersDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Christine JohnsonDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Adrian EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Sarah ArmstrongNIHR Research Design Service, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Rajnikant MehtaNIHR Research Design Service, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Antony Chuter68 Brighton Cottages, Copyhold Lane, Lindfield, Haywards Heath, UK.
Ailsa DonnellyPRIMER (Primary Care Research in Manchester Engagement Resource), The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Darren M AshcroftNIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Joanne LymnSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Pam SmithThe School of Health in Social Science, Teviot Place, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Teviot Place, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Matthew BoydDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Anthony J AveryDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health [UK] PR-R11-0914-11001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMost patient safety research has focused on specialist-care settings where there is an appreciation of the frequency and causes of medical errors, and the resulting burden of adverse events. There have, however, been few large-scale robust studies that have investigated the extent and severity of avoidable harm in primary care. To address this, we will conduct a 12-month retrospective cross-sectional study involving case note review of primary care patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct electronic searches of general practice (GP) clinical computer systems to identify patients with avoidable significant harm. Up to 16 general practices from 3 areas of England (East Midlands, London and the North West) will be recruited based on practice size, to obtain a sample of around 100 000 patients. Our investigations will include an 'enhanced sample' of patients with the highest risk of avoidable significant harm. We will estimate the incidence of avoidable significant harm and express this as 'per 100 000 patients per year'. Univariate and multivariate analysis will be conducted to identify the factors associated with avoidable significant harm. ETHICS/DISSEMINATION: The decision regarding participation by general practices in the study is entirely voluntary; the consent to participate may be withdrawn at any time. We will not seek individual patient consent for the retrospective case note review, but if patients respond to publicity about the project and say they do not wish their records to be included, we will follow these instructions. We will produce a report for the Department of Health's Policy Research Programme and several high-quality peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals. The study has been granted a favourable opinion by the East Midlands Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (reference 15/EM/0411) and Confidentiality Advisory Group approval for access to medical records without consent under section 251 of the NHS Act 2006 (reference 15/CAG/0182).

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionElectronic Health RecordsEnglandGeneral PracticeHumansIncidenceMedical ErrorsPatient SafetyPrimary Health CareResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsGENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)PRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID28213602
PMCPMC5318597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.