Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28212982›Full record

ReviewVision research2017

Vision science and adaptive optics, the state of the field.

Susana Marcos, John S Werner, Stephen A Burns, William H Merigan, Pablo Artal, David A Atchison, Karen M Hampson, Richard Legras, Linda Lundstrom, Geungyoung Yoon and 18 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optics and neural adaptation jointly limit human stereovision.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Electrically Coded Retinomorphic Spectrophotodetector.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Optical and Visual Diet in Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Head-mounted adaptive optics visual simulator.Biomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Multifocal contact lens vision simulated with a clinical binocular simulator.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Susana MarcosInstituto de Optica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
John S WernerUniversity of California, Davis, USA.
Stephen A BurnsIndiana University, Bloomington, USA. Electronic address: staburns@indiana.edu.
William H MeriganUniversity of Rochester, New York, USA.
Pablo ArtalUniversidad de Murcia, Spain.
David A AtchisonQueensland University of Technology, Australia.
Karen M HampsonUniversity of Bradford University, UK.
Richard LegrasUniversité de Paris Sud, France.
Linda LundstromKTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Stockholm, Sweden.
Geungyoung YoonUniversity of Rochester, New York, USA.
Joseph CarrollMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Stacey S ChoiThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nathan DobleThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Adam M DubisUniversity College London, London, UK.
Alfredo DubraStanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Ann ElsnerIndiana University, Bloomington, USA.
Ravi JonnalUniversity of California, Davis, USA.
Donald T MillerIndiana University, Bloomington, USA.
Michel PaquesPierre et Marie Curie University, Paris.
Hannah E SmithsonUniversity of Oxford, UK.
Laura K YoungUniversity of Oxford, UK.
Yuhua ZhangUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Melanie CampbellUniversity of Waterloo, Canada.
Jennifer HunterUniversity of Rochester, New York, USA.
Andrew MethaUniversity of Melbourne, Australia.
Grazyna PalczewskaPolgenix, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jesse SchallekUniversity of Rochester, New York, USA.
Lawrence C SincichUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CORE GRANTP30EY012576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LISA M OAKES · 1999 to 2026
$18.9M
VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Susana Marcos · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
Visual Phenotyping CoreP30EY003039 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LAWRENCE C SINCICH · 1985 to 2026
$16.9M
Optics Instrumentation for Advanced Ophthalmic ImagingR01EY014375 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILLIAMS, DAVID R · 2003 to 2012
$14.9M
Advanced Technology to Study Visual Function on a Cellular ScaleR01EY023591 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI DUNCAN, JACQUE LYNNE, ROORDA, AUSTIN · 2014 to 2023
$11.2M
Physiological and perceptual examination of vision restoration R01EY021166 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MERIGAN, WILLIAM H · 2011 to 2023
$8.4M
Assessing Photoreceptor Structure and Function in Normal and Diseased RetinaeR01EY017607 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Joseph Carroll · 2008 to 2026
$8.3M
Optical Imaging of the Photoreceptor-RPE ComplexR01EY018339 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, DONALD T · 2007 to 2025
$7.7M
RETINAL MECHANISMS AND VISUAL RESOLUTIONR01EY004367 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HUNTER, JENNIFER J, WILLIAMS, DAVID R · 1986 to 2020
$7.3M
Mechanisms and plasticity of long term visual adaptation to ocular opticsR01EY014999 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GEUNYOUNG YOON · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
INVESTIGATIONS OF HUMAN CONE PIGMENT KINETICSR01EY004395 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BURNS, STEPHEN A · 1985 to 2014
$5.7M
SPATIAL EXTENT OF RETINAL DAMAGER01EY007624 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI ELSNER, ANN E · 1995 to 2012
$4.4M
CIHREuropean Research Council 294099European Research Council 339228NEI NIH HHS F32 EY023496NEI NIH HHS K99 EY026068NEI NIH HHS L30 EY017670NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003039NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012576NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019008NEI NIH HHS R00 EY026068NEI NIH HHS R01 EY004367NEI NIH HHS R01 EY004395NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007624NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014375NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014999NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017607NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018339NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020901NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021166NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022371NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023581NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023591NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024239NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024315NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024378NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025231NEI NIH HHS R21 EY021903NEI NIH HHS R41 EY026105NEI NIH HHS R41 EY028499NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025451NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025477NIA NIH HHS R01 AG004058NIA NIH HHS R44 AG043645Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive optics is a relatively new field, yet it is spreading rapidly and allows new questions to be asked about how the visual system is organized. The editors of this feature issue have posed a series of question to scientists involved in using adaptive optics in vision science. The questions are focused on three main areas. In the first we investigate the use of adaptive optics for psychophysical measurements of visual system function and for improving the optics of the eye. In the second, we look at the applications and impact of adaptive optics on retinal imaging and its promise for basic and applied research. In the third, we explore how adaptive optics is being used to improve our understanding of the neurophysiology of the visual system.

Indexed as

Ocular Physiological PhenomenaOptics and PhotonicsAnimalsHumansPsychophysicsRetinaVision DisordersVision, OcularVisual PerceptionAdaptive opticsRetinaRetinal physiologyVision science

Identifiers

PMID28212982
PMCPMC5437977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.