Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28212969›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2017

Lessons Learned When Introducing Pharmacogenomic Panel Testing into Clinical Practice.

Marc B Rosenman, Brian Decker, Kenneth D Levy, Ann M Holmes, Victoria M Pratt, Michael T Eadon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Genetics and Genomics in Sickle Cell Disease in Africa.American journal of hematology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Advancing Pharmacogenomics from Single-Gene to Preemptive Testing.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Approaches to assessing the provider experience with clinical pharmacogenomic information: a scoping review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marc B RosenmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: marc.rosenman@northwestern.edu.
Brian DeckerDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kenneth D LevyDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ann M HolmesDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Victoria M PrattDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Michael T EadonDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

Embedding Pharmacogenotyping in an Integrated Health System for the UnderservedU01HG007762 · NHGRI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DEXTER, PAUL, SKAAR, TODD C. · 2014 to 2018
$4.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImplementing new programs to support precision medicine in clinical settings is a complex endeavor. We describe challenges and potential solutions based on the Indiana GENomics Implementation: an Opportunity for the Underserved (INGenious) program at Eskenazi Health-one of six sites supported by the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE network grant of the National Institutes of Health/National Human Genome Research Institute. INGenious is an implementation of a panel of genomic tests.

methodsWe conducted a descriptive case study of the implementation of this pharmacogenomics program, which has a wide scope (14 genes, 27 medications) and a diverse population (patients who often have multiple chronic illnesses, in a large urban safety-net hospital and its outpatient clinics). CHALLENGES: We placed the clinical pharmacogenomics implementation challenges into six categories: patient education and engagement in care decision making; clinician education and changes in standards of care; integration of technology into electronic health record systems; translational and implementation sciences in real-world clinical environments; regulatory and reimbursement considerations, and challenges in measuring outcomes. A cross-cutting theme was the need for careful attention to workflow. Our clinical setting, a safety-net health care system, presented some distinctive challenges. Patients often had multiple chronic illnesses and sometimes were taking more than one pharmacogenomics-relevant medication. Reaching patients for recruitment or follow-up was another challenge.

conclusionsNew, large-scale endeavors in health care are challenging. A description of the challenges that we encountered and the approaches that we adopted to address them may provide insights for those who implement and study innovations in other health care systems.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalSystems IntegrationElectronic Health RecordsHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Outcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPharmacogenomic TestingPrecision MedicineResearch DesignSafety-net ProvidersUnited StatesWorkflowclinical decision supportelectronic health recordspharmacogenomicsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID28212969
PMCPMC7543044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.