Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28212937›Full record

Observational studyBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2017

Impact of Alemtuzumab Scheduling on Graft-versus-Host Disease after Unrelated Donor Fludarabine and Melphalan Allografts.

Kile Green, Kim Pearce, Rob S Sellar, Laura Jardine, Phillip L R Nicolson, Sandeep Nagra, Venetia Bigley, Graham Jackson, Anne M Dickinson, Kirsty Thomson and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kile GreenInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Kim PearceInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Rob S SellarCancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Laura JardineInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Northern Centre for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Phillip L R NicolsonSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Sandeep NagraCentre for Clinical Haematology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Venetia BigleyInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Northern Centre for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Graham JacksonNorthern Centre for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Anne M DickinsonInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Kirsty ThomsonCancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen MackinnonCancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Charles CraddockSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Clinical Haematology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Karl S PeggsCancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew CollinInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Northern Centre for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. Electronic address: matthew.collin@newcastle.ac.uk.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 101155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alemtuzumab conditioning is highly effective at reducing the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in reduced-intensity fludarabine and melphalan transplantation with cyclosporine monotherapy. Less frequent and lower dose scheduling may be used with sibling donors, but an optimal regimen for matched unrelated donors has not been defined. In this retrospective observational study of 313 patients, the incidence and severity of GVHD was compared in patients receiving 3 different dose schedules: the standard 100-mg regimen (20 mg on days -7 to -3), 60 mg (30 mg on days -4 and -2), or 50 mg (10 mg on days -7 to -3). Patients treated with 100 mg, 60 mg, or 50 mg developed acute GVHD grades I to IV with an incidence of 74%, 65%, and 64%, respectively, whereas 36%, 32%, and 41% developed chronic GHVD. An excess of severe acute grades III/IV GVHD was observed in the 50-mg cohort (15% versus 2% to 6%; P = .016). The relative risk of severe acute grade GVHD remained more than 3-fold higher in the 50-mg cohort compared with the 100-mg cohort after adjustment for differences in HLA match, age, gender mismatch, cytomegalovirus risk, and diagnosis (P = .030). The findings indicate that the 60-mg alemtuzumab schedule was comparable with the 100-mg schedule, but more attenuated schedules may increase the risk of severe grade GVHD.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlemtuzumabAllograftsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMelphalanMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTransplantation ConditioningUnrelated DonorsAlemtuzumabfludarabineMelphalanVidarabineAlemtuzumabConditioning regimensGraft-versus-host diseaseT cell depletion

Identifiers

PMID28212937
PMCPMC6588535
OpenAlexW2588855221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.