ArticleHIV clinical trials2017
Feasibility of identifying out of care HIV-positive patients in a hospital setting and enrolling them in a retention intervention.
Article in HIV clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association of Unmet Needs With Subsequent Retention in Care and HIV Suppression Among Hospitalized Patients With HIV Who Are Out of Care.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019Trial
- Development and Initial Feasibility of a Hospital-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention to Improve Retention in Care for Out-of-Care Persons with HIV: Lessons Learned from an Open Pilot Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- HIV care cascade before and after hospitalization: impact of a multidisciplinary inpatient team in the US South.AIDS care · 2020Article
- An initiative using informatics to facilitate clinical research planning and recruitment in the VA health care system.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe hospital setting provides an opportunity to re-engage people living with HIV (PLWH) in HIV care. We developed and implemented a protocol to identify PLWH in a hospital setting. The aim of the current study was to report on our strategy to recruit hospitalized HIV patients into an intervention study, and to report on lessons learned for future studies.
methodsOur protocol was developed based on experience of our research staff in recruiting HIV patients as well as clinical input from providers and administrators on delivering care in hospitalized settings. We identified hospitalized PLWH between 2010 and 2013 who were potentially eligible for an intervention study. Patients were identified by review of electronic medical records and clinician referral, followed by in-person screening to confirm eligibility. We examined factors related to identifying and enrolling hospitalized patients, and documented lessons learned.
resultsKey strategies included systematic medical record review followed by in-person screening, collaboration with staff, and flexibility in recruitment logistics. We identified 1801 PLWH hospitalized during the 3-year study period. Eighty-four percent (n = 1514) met the met the inclusion criteria based on medical record review. Of these, 48% (n = 733) were ineligible. Among eligible patients, 59% (n = 460) were enrolled. Only 3% (n = 23) of eligible patients declined; 84% (n = 321) were not enrolled because they were discharged before enrollment. Lessons learned included (1) needing to identify patients and deliver the intervention before hospital discharge, (2) limiting the complexity of the intervention, and (3) having research staff available on weekends and after hours.
conclusionsTargeted recruitment of hospitalized populations is a feasible and productive approach for finding and engaging PLWH who are newly diagnosed or out of routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.