Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28212399›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Instrument design and protocol for the study of light controlled processes in aquatic organisms, and its application to examine the effect of infrared light on zebrafish.

Marcus P S Dekens, Nicholas S Foulkes, Kristin Tessmar-Raible

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Two light sensors decode moonlight versus sunlight to adjust a plastic circadian/circalunidian clock to moon phase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A GBMC biology · 2018
    Article
  9. An Overview of Monthly Rhythms and Clocks.Frontiers in neurology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus P S DekensMax Perutz Laboratories, Vienna Biocenter, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nicholas S FoulkesKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein, Germany.
Kristin Tessmar-RaibleMax Perutz Laboratories, Vienna Biocenter, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Vienna · ATVienna Biocenter · AT

Funding

Biosynthesis of the Immunomodulatory Molecule Capsular Polysaccharide AR15GM100402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI TROUTMAN, JERRY M · 2012 to 2012
$321k
Austrian Science Fund FWF P 28970European Research Council 337011NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM100402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acquisition of reliable data strongly depends on experimental design. When studying the effects of light on processes such as behaviour and physiology it is crucial to maintain all environmental conditions constant apart from the one under study. Furthermore, the precise values of the environmental factors applied during the experiment should be known. Although seemingly obvious, these conditions are often not met when the effects of light are being studied. Here, we document and discuss the wavelengths and light intensities of natural and artificial light sources. We present standardised experimental protocols together with building plans of a custom made instrument designed to accurately control light and temperature for experiments using fresh water or marine species. Infrared light is commonly used for recording behaviour and in electrophysiological experiments although the properties of fish photoreceptors potentially allow detection into the far red. As an example of our experimental procedure we have applied our protocol and instrument to specifically test the impact of infrared light (840 nm) on the zebrafish circadian clock, which controls many aspects of behaviour, physiology and metabolism. We demonstrate that infrared light does not influence the zebrafish circadian clock. Our results help to provide a solid framework for the future study of light dependent processes in aquatic organisms.

Indexed as

Infrared RaysAnimalsBiological AssayCircadian ClocksEquipment DesignZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28212399
PMCPMC5315407
OpenAlexW2588395203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.