Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28212309›Full record

ArticleNutrients2017

The Association of Knowledge and Behaviours Related to Salt with 24-h Urinary Salt Excretion in a Population from North and South India.

Claire Johnson, Sailesh Mohan, Kris Rogers, Roopa Shivashankar, Sudhir Raj Thout, Priti Gupta, Feng J He, Graham A MacGregor, Jacqui Webster, Anand Krishnan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Salt-related practices and its association with 24-hour urinary sodium excretion in an Uruguayan population cohort.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Claire JohnsonThe George Institute for Global Health, Box M201 Missenden Rd, Sydney 2006, Australia. cjohnson@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Sailesh MohanPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi 110070, India. smohan@phfi.org.
Kris RogersThe George Institute for Global Health, Box M201 Missenden Rd, Sydney 2006, Australia. krogers@georgeinstitute.org.
Roopa ShivashankarPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi 110070, India. roopa@ccdcindia.org.
Sudhir Raj ThoutGeorge Institute for Global Health, Hyderabad 500034, India. traj@georgeinstitute.org.in.
Priti GuptaPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi 110070, India. priti@ccdcindia.org.
Feng J HeWolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. f.he@qmul.ac.uk.
Graham A MacGregorWolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. g.macgregor@qmul.ac.uk.
Jacqui WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, Box M201 Missenden Rd, Sydney 2006, Australia. jwebster@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Anand KrishnanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India. kanandiyer@yahoo.com.
Pallab K MaulikGeorge Institute for Global Health, Hyderabad 500034, India. pmaulik@georgeinstitute.org.in.
K Srinath ReddyPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi 110070, India. ksrinath.reddy@phfi.org.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi 110070, India. dprabhakaran@ccdcindia.org.
Bruce NealThe George Institute for Global Health, Box M201 Missenden Rd, Sydney 2006, Australia. bneal@georgeinstitute.org.au.
Public Health Foundation of India · INThe University of Sydney · AUCentre for Chronic Disease Control · INQueen Mary University of London · GBAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INGeorge Institute for Global Health · INThe George Institute for Global Health · AUThe George Institute for Global Health · GB

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/I/13/1/500879Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumer knowledge is understood to play a role in managing risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease and may be influenced by level of education. The association between population knowledge, behaviours and actual salt consumption was explored overall, and for more-educated compared to less-educated individuals. A cross-sectional survey was done in an age-and sex-stratified random sample of 1395 participants from urban and rural areas of North and South India. A single 24-h urine sample, participants' physical measurements and questionnaire data were collected. The mean age of participants was 40 years, 47% were women and mean 24-h urinary salt excretion was 9.27 (8.87-9.69) g/day. Many participants reported favourable knowledge and behaviours to minimise risks related to salt. Several of these behaviours were associated with reduced salt intake-less use of salt while cooking, avoidance of snacks, namkeens, and avoidance of pickles (all

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsRural PopulationSodiumSodium Chloride, DietarySurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationSodiumSodium Chloride, DietaryattitudebehaviourIndiaknowledgesalturinary sodium excretion

Identifiers

PMID28212309
PMCPMC5331575
OpenAlexW2589097103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.