Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28211988›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2017

Intrathecal enzyme replacement therapy reverses cognitive decline in mucopolysaccharidosis type I.

Igor Nestrasil, Elsa Shapiro, Alena Svatkova, Patricia Dickson, Agnes Chen, Amy Wakumoto, Alia Ahmed, Edward Stehel, Sarah McNeil, Curtis Gravance and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Enzyme replacement therapy: efficacy and limitations.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Igor NestrasilUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Elsa ShapiroUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Alena SvatkovaUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Patricia DicksonLos Angeles Biomedical Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, California.
Agnes ChenLos Angeles Biomedical Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, California.
Amy WakumotoUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Alia AhmedUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Edward StehelUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Sarah McNeilUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Curtis GravanceRyan Foundation, Carrollton, Texas.
Elizabeth MaherUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
University of Minnesota System · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USCentral European Institute of Technology · CZLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute · USNATA Research and Education Foundation · USUCLA Medical Center · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
Training & EducationU54NS065768 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WHITLEY, CHESTER B. · 2009 to 2024
$17.7M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)KL2TR000113 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$5.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000113NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is an inherited lysosomal storage disease that seriously affects the brain. Severity of neurocognitive symptoms in attenuated MPS subtype (MPS IA) broadly varies partially, due to restricted permeability of blood-brain barrier (BBB) which limits treatment effects of intravenously applied α-L-iduronidase (rhIDU) enzyme. Intrathecal (IT) rhIDU application as a possible solution to circumvent BBB improved brain outcomes in canine models; therefore, our study quantifies effects of IT rhIDU on brain structure and function in an MPS IA patient with previous progressive cognitive decline. Neuropsychological testing and MRIs were performed twice prior (baseline, at 1 year) and twice after initiating IT rhIDU (at 2nd and 3rd years). The difference between pre- and post-treatment means was evaluated as a percentage of the change. Neurocognitive performance improved particularly in memory tests and resulted in improved school performance after IT rhIDU treatment. White matter (WM) integrity improved together with an increase of WM and corpus callosum volumes. Hippocampal and gray matter volume decreased which may either parallel reduction of glycosaminoglycan storage or reflect typical longitudinal brain changes in early adulthood. In conclusion, our outcomes suggest neurological benefits of IT rhIDU compared to the intravenous administration on brain structure and function in a single MPS IA patient.© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Enzyme Replacement TherapyCognitive DysfunctionHumansIduronidaseInjections, SpinalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMucopolysaccharidosis INeuropsychological TestsPhenotypeTreatment OutcomeWhite MatterYoung AdultIduronidaseblood-brain barrierbraindiffusion tensor imagingenzyme replacement therapyintrathecal administrationmagnetic resonance imagingmucopolysaccharidosisneuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID28211988
PMCPMC5367919
OpenAlexW2588822066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.