Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28211848›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2017

Host specificity of Symbiodinium variants revealed by an ITS2 metahaplotype approach.

Edward G Smith, Remi N Ketchum, John A Burt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Distribution and biogeography ofEcology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Considerations for maximizing the adaptive potential of restored coral populations in the western Atlantic.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward G SmithCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Remi N KetchumCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
John A BurtCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of the widely used ITS region is confounded by the presence of intragenomic variants (IGVs). In Symbiodinium, the algal symbionts of reef building corals, deep-sequencing analyses are used to characterise communities within corals, yet these analyses largely overlook IGVs. Here we consider that distinct ITS2 sequences could represent IGVs rather than distinct symbiont types and argue that symbionts can be distinguished by their proportional composition of IGVs, described as their ITS2 metahaplotype. Using our metahaplotype approach on Minimum Entropy Decomposition (MED) analysis of ITS2 sequences from the corals Acropora downingi, Cyphastrea microphthalma and Playgyra daedalea, we show the dominance of a single species-specific Symbiodinium C3 variant within each coral species. We confirm the presence of these species-specific symbionts using the psbA non-coding region. Our findings highlight the importance of accounting for IGVs in ITS2 analyses and demonstrate their capacity to resolve biological patterns that would otherwise be overlooked.

Indexed as

Host SpecificitySymbiosisAnimalsAnthozoaCoral ReefsDinoflagellidaDNA, Ribosomal SpacerHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSpecies SpecificityDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID28211848
PMCPMC5437344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.