Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28211847›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2017

Syntrophic linkage between predatory Carpediemonas and specific prokaryotic populations.

Emmo Hamann, Halina E Tegetmeyer, Dietmar Riedel, Sten Littmann, Soeren Ahmerkamp, Jianwei Chen, Philipp F Hach, Marc Strous

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmo HamannDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Halina E TegetmeyerMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1970-4457
Dietmar RiedelMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
Sten LittmannMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Soeren AhmerkampMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Jianwei ChenDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Philipp F HachMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Marc StrousDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology · DEUniversity of Calgary · CABielefeld University · DEMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

European Research Council 242635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most anoxic environments are populated by small (<10 μm) heterotrophic eukaryotes that prey on different microbial community members. How predatory eukaryotes engage in beneficial interactions with other microbes has rarely been investigated so far. Here, we studied an example of such an interaction by cultivating the anerobic marine flagellate, Carpediemonas frisia sp. nov. (supergroup Excavata), with parts of its naturally associated microbiome. This microbiome consisted of so far uncultivated members of the Deltaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia and Nanoarchaeota. Using genome and transcriptome informed metabolic network modeling, we showed that Carpediemonas stimulated prokaryotic growth through the release of predigested biomolecules such as proteins, sugars, organic acids and hydrogen. Transcriptional gene activities suggested niche separation between biopolymer degrading Bacteroidetes, monomer utilizing Firmicutes and Nanoarchaeota and hydrogen oxidizing Deltaproteobacteria. An efficient metabolite exchange between the different community members appeared to be promoted by the formation of multispecies aggregates. Physiological experiments showed that Carpediemonas could also benefit from an association to these aggregates, as it facilitated the removal of inhibiting metabolites and increased the availability of prey bacteria. Taken together, our results provide a framework to understand how predatory microbial eukaryotes engage, across trophic levels, in beneficial interactions with specific prokaryotic populations.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaDeltaproteobacteriaEukaryotaMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMicrobial InteractionsNanoarchaeota

Identifiers

PMID28211847
PMCPMC5437931
OpenAlexW2588960210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.