Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28211791›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Motor control of

Olivia Schwarz, Ali Asgar Bohra, Xinyu Liu, Heinrich Reichert, Krishnaswamy VijayRaghavan, Jan Pielage

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Connectomic mapping of pharyngeal and gut sensory circuits in adultbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The fruit fly,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Connectomic analysis of taste circuits inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Measurement of Taste Memory inCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2023
    Article
  15. Measurement of Reflexive Feeding Response inCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Olivia SchwarzFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Ali Asgar BohraNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute for Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India.
Xinyu LiuFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Heinrich ReichertBiozentrum University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Krishnaswamy VijayRaghavanNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute for Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4705-5629
Jan PielageFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5115-5884
National Centre for Biological Sciences · INUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise coordination of body parts is essential for survival and behavior of higher organisms. While progress has been made towards the identification of central mechanisms coordinating limb movement, only limited knowledge exists regarding the generation and execution of sequential motor action patterns at the level of individual motoneurons. Here we use Drosophila proboscis extension as a model system for a reaching-like behavior. We first provide a neuroanatomical description of the motoneurons and muscles contributing to proboscis motion. Using genetic targeting in combination with artificial activation and silencing assays we identify the individual motoneurons controlling the five major sequential steps of proboscis extension and retraction. Activity-manipulations during naturally evoked proboscis extension show that orchestration of serial motoneuron activation does not rely on feed-forward mechanisms. Our data support a model in which central command circuits recruit individual motoneurons to generate task-specific proboscis extension sequences.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimal StructuresDrosophilaFeeding BehaviorGene SilencingModels, NeurologicalMotor NeuronsMovementMusclesTranscriptional ActivationD. melanogasterfeeding behaviormotoneuronsmotor circuitneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID28211791
PMCPMC5315463
OpenAlexW2588896198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.