Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28211496›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The Use of Bright and Dark Types of Humour is Rooted in the Brain.

Ilona Papousek, Willibald Ruch, Christian Rominger, Elisabeth Kindermann, Katharina Scheidl, Günter Schulter, Andreas Fink, Elisabeth M Weiss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilona PapousekUniversity of Graz, Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology Unit, Graz, Austria.
Willibald RuchUniversity of Zurich, Department of Psychology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian RomingerUniversity of Graz, Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology Unit, Graz, Austria.
Elisabeth KindermannUniversity of Graz, Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology Unit, Graz, Austria.
Katharina ScheidlUniversity of Graz, Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology Unit, Graz, Austria.
Günter SchulterUniversity of Graz, Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology Unit, Graz, Austria.
Andreas FinkUniversity of Graz, Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology Unit, Graz, Austria.
Elisabeth M WeissUniversity of Graz, Department of Psychology, Biological Psychology Unit, Graz, Austria.
University of Graz · ATUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 27750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ways in which humour can be used are related to the manifold interpersonal functions humour can serve, some of which are positive, and some negative. In the present study, phasic changes in the functional coupling of prefrontal and posterior cortex (EEG coherence) during other people's auditory displays of happy and sad mood were recorded to predict people's typical use of humour in social interactions. Greater use of benevolent humour, the intentions of which are in keeping with the characteristics of "laughing-with" humour, was associated with greater decreases of prefrontal-posterior coupling during the processing of happy laughter. More loose prefrontal-posterior coupling indicates loosening of control of the prefrontal cortex over the incoming perceptual information, thereby opening up the perceptual gate and allowing the brain to become more affected by the social-emotional signals. Greater use of humour styles linked to malicious intentions of "laughing-at" humour was associated with responses indicating a wider opened perceptual gate during the processing of other people's crying. The findings are consistent with the idea that typical humour styles develop in line with the rewarding values of their outcomes (e.g., interaction partners are happy or hurt), which in turn are defined through the individuals' latent interpersonal goals.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrainCryingElectroencephalographyEmotionsFemaleHumansLaughterLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28211496
PMCPMC5314334
OpenAlexW2588959663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.