ArticleScientific reports2017
Association of Female Reproductive Factors with Hypertension, Diabetes and LQTc in Chinese Women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of the time interval between first and last birth with obesity in middle-aged postmenopausal Chinese women: a cross-sectional study in southern China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Association of parity with the prevalence of hypertension in Japan: The Tohoku Medical Megabank Community-based cohort study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
- Parity and incident type 2 diabetes in older Chinese women: Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Associations of Parity With Change in Global Cognition and Incident Cognitive Impairment in Older Women.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Live birth/parity number and the risk of incident hypertension among parous women during over 13 years of follow-up.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Article
- Does parity matter in women's risk of dementia? A COSMIC collaboration cohort study.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Screening for chronic conditions with reproductive factors using a machine learning based approach.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Differential effects of completed and incomplete pregnancies on the risk of Alzheimer disease.Neurology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association of female reproductive factors (FRFs) with cardiovascular risk factors among different population was variable and inconsistent. The objective of this study was to examine the association between FRFs and hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and long heart-rate-corrected QT interval (LQTc) in Chinese post-menopausal women (Post-MW). A total of 8046 Post-MW from the China Chaoshan Biobank Cohort Study were included for analysis. Logistic regression and general linear regression models were used to estimate the association between FRFs and hypertension, DM, and LQTc. Compared with women with 0 or 1 live birth, increasing risk of hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.96), DM (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.22-2.22), and LQTc (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.09) were observed in women who had five or more live births. Further analysis demonstrated that the association between parity and hypertension, DM, and LQTc was mediated by lifestyle and dyslipidemia. Women with more live births had increased body mass index and waist circumstance, and were inclined to consume more salty food, animal fat, and alcohol, but less meat, vegetable, fish, plant oil, and tea, compared with that had fewer live births (all P < 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.