ArticleNeuroinformatics2017
Multi-View Ensemble Classification of Brain Connectivity Images for Neurodegeneration Type Discrimination.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early classification of functional connectomes in Parkinson's disease: a comparison of machine learning classifiers using multi-scale topological features.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Machine learning diagnostic model for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis analysis using MRI-derived features.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- View selection in multi-view stacking: choosing the meta-learner.Advances in data analysis and classification · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurodegenerative diseases research: a bibliometric analysis since 2000.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Functional gradients reveal cortical hierarchy changes in multiple sclerosis.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Implications of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Motor Neuron Diseases-A Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Machine Learning for Biomarker Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Classification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by brain volume, connectivity, and network dynamics.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Analyzing Hierarchical Multi-View MRI Data With StaPLR: An Application to Alzheimer's Disease Classification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Bayesian Network as a Decision Tool for Predicting ALS Disease.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Identification of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Based on Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Support Vector Machine.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Multi-parametric and multi-regional histogram analysis of MRI: modality integration reveals imaging phenotypes of glioblastoma.European radiology · 2019Article
- Machine Learning in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Achievements, Pitfalls, and Future Directions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
- Preventing inpatient falls with injuries using integrative machine learning prediction: a cohort study.NPJ digital medicine · 2019Article
- Linking structural and effective brain connectivity: structurally informed Parametric Empirical Bayes (si-PEB).Brain structure & function · 2019Article
- Computer-Aided Multi-Target Management of Emergent Alzheimer's Disease.Bioinformation · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain connectivity analyses using voxels as features are not robust enough for single-patient classification because of the inter-subject anatomical and functional variability. To construct more robust features, voxels can be aggregated into clusters that are maximally coherent across subjects. Moreover, combining multi-modal neuroimaging and multi-view data integration techniques allows generating multiple independent connectivity features for the same patient. Structural and functional connectivity features were extracted from multi-modal MRI images with a clustering technique, and used for the multi-view classification of different phenotypes of neurodegeneration by an ensemble learning method (random forest). Two different multi-view models (intermediate and late data integration) were trained on, and tested for the classification of, individual whole-brain default-mode network (DMN) and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps, from 41 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, 37 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and 43 healthy control (HC) subjects. Both multi-view data models exhibited ensemble classification accuracies significantly above chance. In ALS patients, multi-view models exhibited the best performances (intermediate: 82.9%, late: 80.5% correct classification) and were more discriminative than each single-view model. In PD patients and controls, multi-view models' performances were lower (PD: 59.5%, 62.2%; HC: 56.8%, 59.1%) but higher than at least one single-view model. Training the models only on patients, produced more than 85% patients correctly discriminated as ALS or PD type and maximal performances for multi-view models. These results highlight the potentials of mining complementary information from the integration of multiple data views in the classification of connectivity patterns from multi-modal brain images in the study of neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.