Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28210940›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2017

Syndromic Diagnosis in Evaluation of Women with Symptoms of Vaginitis.

Theophilus Ogochukwu Nwankwo, Uzochukwu Uzoma Aniebue, Uchenna Anthony Umeh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Allergic vulvovaginitis: a systematic literature review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing a diagnosis tool for bacterial vaginosis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theophilus Ogochukwu NwankwoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Enugu States, Nigeria. ogoonwankwo@yahoo.com.
Uzochukwu Uzoma AniebueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Enugu States, Nigeria.
Uchenna Anthony UmehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Enugu States, Nigeria.
University of Nigeria · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review aims to determine the effectiveness of the use of syndrome diagnosis in the evaluation of vaginitis and to make suggestions based on the review findings. RECENT

findingsVaginal discharge as the main symptom of vaginitis is unspecific. A randomized study of symptom-based diagnosis and treatment of vaginitis in the USA favored symptoms used for treatment; however, this was only a pilot study. Hence, a population-based study is necessary to validate these findings. Most of the study that assessed treatment of vaginitis in pregnancy reported low diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for bacterial vaginosis and vaginal candidiasis and a wide range for trichomonas vaginalis reflecting ineffectiveness of syndrome-based treatment in pregnancy. A systematic review of the web for relevant literature was made, and appropriate articles were extracted and reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive values were used, where applicable to determine effectiveness. Forty-three full articles and abstracts were reviewed. Studies that validated or applied WHO algorithm for treatment of vaginitis reported high sensitivity (91.5-100%) but moderate to low specificity (0-27.5%) among women with vaginal symptoms. Studies that focused on symptoms for diagnosis of the three main etiologic agents of vaginitis reported low sensitivity and specificity, while such studies in pregnancy reported sensitivity and specificity ranging from 35.4 to 54% for TV, 11 to 100% for BV, and 0 to 56.2% for trichomonas vaginalis, bacterial vaginosis, and vaginal candidiasis, respectively. Studies that added point of care test reported higher sensitivity and specificity and positive predictive value. The use of WHO syndrome-based algorithm or its modification for treatment of vaginitis though moderately effective has the potential for overtreatment and physician error. Point of care testing and laboratory investigation are essential for productive intervention especially in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Bacteria vaginosisSyndromic evaluationTrichomonas vaginalisVaginal candidiasisVaginitis

Identifiers

PMID28210940
OpenAlexW2588527583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.