Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28210935›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2018

The effect of fluid resuscitation on the effective circulating volume in patients undergoing liver surgery: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Jaap Jan Vos, A F Kalmar, H G D Hendriks, J Bakker, T W L Scheeren

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jaap Jan VosDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands. j.j.vos@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0597-6462
A F KalmarDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
H G D HendriksDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands.
J BakkerDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
T W L ScheerenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30001, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the significance of an analogue of the mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsa) and its derived variables, in providing a physiology based discrimination between responders and non-responders to fluid resuscitation during liver surgery. A post-hoc analysis of data from 30 patients undergoing major hepatic surgery was performed. Patients received 15 ml kg

Indexed as

Central Venous PressureAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralAnestheticsBlood PressureCardiac OutputCritical IllnessData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleFluid TherapyHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansLiverMaleAnestheticsCirculating volumeDynamic variablesFluid resuscitationHemodynamic monitoringLiver surgeryMean systemic filling pressureVenous return

Identifiers

PMID28210935
PMCPMC5750327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.