Nerve-sparing surgery and sexual and urinary dysfunction after multimodality treatment for rectal cancer.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. PDE-5i Management of Erectile Dysfunction After Rectal Surgery: A Systematic Review Focusing on Treatment Efficacy.American journal of men's health
   Pooled it
2. Sexual dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017
   Review
3. CUSA for laparoscopic left colectomy.Techniques in coloproctology · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  CUSA for laparoscopic left colectomy.2017
• Comment on
  Nerve-sparing high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA).2017

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as