Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28210788›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Surgical management of degenerative meniscus lesions: the 2016 ESSKA meniscus consensus.

Ph Beaufils, R Becker, S Kopf, M Englund, R Verdonk, M Ollivier, R Seil

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
29.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 331 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Health-economic evaluation of meniscus tear treatments: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation does not result in more favourable outcomes in arthroscopic meniscal repair: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Meniscal repair: The current state and recent advances in augmentation.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Meniscal allograft transplantation after meniscectomy: clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Subgroups of patients with osteoarthritis and medial meniscus tear or crystal arthropathy benefit from arthroscopic treatment.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Guideline
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ph BeaufilsOrthopaedics Department, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, 78150, Le Chesnay, France.
R BeckerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital Brandenburg, Medical School Theodor Fontane, Hochstrasse 26, 14770, Brandenburg, Havel, Germany.
S KopfCenter for Musculosketal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, AugustenburgerPlatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
M EnglundOrthopaedics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Klinikgatan 22, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
R VerdonkUniversiteit Gent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
M OllivierOrthopaedics Department, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, 78150, Le Chesnay, France.
R SeilDépartement de l'Appareil Locomoteur, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg - Clinique d' Eich, 78, Rue d'Eich, 1460, Luxembourg, Germany. seil.romain@chl.lu.
Centre Hospitalier de Versailles · FRCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGhent University · BEKlinikum Brandenburg · DELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA degenerative meniscus lesion is a slowly developing process typically involving a horizontal cleavage in a middle-aged or older person. When the knee is symptomatic, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy has been practised for a long time with many case series reporting improved patient outcomes. Since 2002, several randomised clinical trials demonstrated no additional benefit of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy compared to non-operative treatment, sham surgery or sham arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. These results introduced controversy in the medical community and made clinical decision-making challenging in the daily clinical practice. To facilitate the clinical decision-making process, a consensus was developed. This initiative was endorsed by ESSKA.

methodsA degenerative meniscus lesion was defined as a lesion occurring without any history of significant acute trauma in a patient older than 35 years. Congenital lesions, traumatic meniscus tears and degenerative lesions occurring in young patients, especially in athletes, were excluded. The project followed the so-called formal consensus process, involving a steering group, a rating group and a peer-review group. A total of 84 surgeons and scientists from 22 European countries were included in the process. Twenty questions, their associated answers and an algorithm based on extensive literature review and clinical expertise, were proposed. Each question and answer set was graded according to the scientific level of the corresponding literature.

resultsThe main finding was that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy should not be proposed as a first line of treatment for degenerative meniscus lesions. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy should only be considered after a proper standardised clinical and radiological evaluation and when the response to non-operative management has not been satisfactory. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee is typically not indicated in the first-line work-up, but knee radiography should be used as an imaging tool to support a diagnosis of osteoarthritis or to detect certain rare pathologies, such as tumours or fractures of the knee. DISCUSSION: The present work offers a clear framework for the management of degenerative meniscus lesions, with the aim to balance information extracted from the scientific evidence and clinical expertise. Because of biases and weaknesses of the current literature and lack of definition of important criteria such as mechanical symptoms, it cannot be considered as an exact treatment algorithm. It summarises the results of the "ESSKA Meniscus Consensus Project" ( http://www.esska.org/education/projects ) and is the first official European consensus on this topic. The consensus may be updated and refined as more high-quality evidence emerges. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedArthroscopyBone NeoplasmsCartilage DiseasesConservative TreatmentEuropeFractures, BoneHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMenisci, TibialMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePractice Guidelines as TopicRadiographyResearch DesignArthroscopic partial meniscectomyConsensusDegenerative LesionManagementMeniscus

Identifiers

PMID28210788
PMCPMC5331096
OpenAlexW2588589832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.