ArticleSingapore medical journal2017
Depression in primary care: assessing suicide risk.
Article in Singapore medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global economic burden of depression in 154 countries from 2025 to 2050.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Increased risk of suicide after stroke: A population-based matched cohort study.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2026Article
- Digitalized suicide risk assessment in emergency psychiatry services.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Investigation of Herb-Drug Interactions betweenAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Article
- A Fast and Minimal System to Identify Depression Using Smartphones: Explainable Machine Learning-Based Approach.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- The Impact of Social Media on the Mental Health of Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Psychological Capital and Self-Acceptance Modified the Association of Depressive Tendency with Self-Rated Health of College Students in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Southeast Asian expert consensus on the management of major depressive disorder with suicidal behavior in adults under 65 years of age.BMC psychiatry · 2022Review
- Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Prenatal Mental Health and Substance Use Among Urban, Low-Income Women.Community mental health journal · 2022Article
- Recognizing the role of the vagus nerve in depression from microbiota-gut brain axis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Practical Advice for Primary Care Clinicians on the Safe and Effective Use of Vortioxetine for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Review
- Beneficial Effects of Acupuncture as a Complementary Treatment for Patients Receiving Paroxetine For Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.Medical acupuncture · 2021Article
- Article
- Dysregulation of Protein Kinase C in Adult Depression and Suicide: Evidence From Postmortem Brain Studies.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Review
- Managing depression in primary care.Singapore medical journal · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major depression is a common condition seen in the primary care setting. This article describes the suicide risk assessment of a depressed patient, including practical aspects of history-taking, consideration of factors in deciding if a patient requires immediate transfer for inpatient care and measures to be taken if the patient is not hospitalised. It follows on our earlier article about the approach to management of depression in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.