ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2016
Responsiveness Comparison of the EQ-5D, PROMIS Global Health, and VR-12 Questionnaires in Knee Arthroscopy.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05272631 (Depuy Synthes Lower Extremity Shaft Nail Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Depuy Synthes Lower Extremity Shaft Nail Registry (RFN-Advanced™ Retrograde Femoral Nailing System/ TN-Advanced™ Tibial Nailing System)
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Inconsistencies in clinically significant outcome metrics for knee cartilage repair: a systematic review.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- A Portable System for Remote Rehabilitation Following a Total Knee Replacement: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Trial
- Article
- Establishing the Minimally Important Difference for the KOOS-Joint Replacement and PROMIS Global-10 in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Guselkumab, a Selective Interleukin-23 p19 Subunit Inhibitor, Resolves Dactylitis in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Pooled Results Through Week 52 From Two Phase 3 Studies.ACR open rheumatology · 2023Article
- The Greifswald Post COVID Rehabilitation Study and Research (PoCoRe)-Study Design, Characteristics and Evaluation Tools.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A framework to make PROMs relevant to patients: qualitative study of communication preferences of PROMs.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Prospective Outcomes of Cryopreserved Osteochondral Allograft for Patellofemoral Cartilage Defects at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.Cartilage · 2021Article
- Health Conditions, Substance Use, Physical Activity, and Quality of Life in Current and Former Baseball Players.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Translation and adaptation of the German version of the Veterans Rand-36/12 Item Health Survey.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
- A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee with Active Control.Journal of stem cells & regenerative medicine · 2021Article
- Psychometric properties of visual analog scale assessments for function, pain, and strength compared with disease-specific upper extremity outcome measures in rotator cuff repair.JSES international · 2020Article
- Sex differences in outcomes after arthroscopic bankart repair.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2020Article
- Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction significantly improved quality of life in patients with recurrent patella dislocation: a response to Hiemstra et al.'s letter to the editor.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function correlates with Toronto Extremity Salvage Score in an orthopaedic oncology population.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2019Article
- Performance of PROMIS Computer Adaptive Testing As Compared With Established Instruments for Multiple-Ligament Knee Injuries.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2019Article
- Performance of the PROMIS After Operative Interventions for Shoulder Instability.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 10 Global Health, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) are generic patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires that assess a patient's general health. In choosing a PRO to track general health status, it is necessary to consider which measure will be the most responsive to change after treatment. To date, no studies exist comparing responsiveness among the EQ-5D, PROMIS 10 Global Health, and the Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). PURPOSE: To determine which of the generic PROs are most responsive internally and externally in the setting of knee arthroscopy. STUDY
designCohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
methodsFifty patients who underwent knee arthroscopy were surveyed preoperatively and a mean 3.6 months postoperatively, with 90% follow-up. PROs included the EQ-5D, EQ-5D visual analog scale, PROMIS 10 Global Health (PROMIS 10) physical and mental components, VR-12 physical and mental components, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain subscale. Internal responsiveness was evaluated by performing paired
resultsFor internal responsiveness, 3 PROs showed a statistically significant improvement in score after treatment (EQ-5D: +0.10 [95% CI, 0.06-0.15], VR-12 physical: +7.2 [95% CI, 4.0-10.4]), and PROMIS 10 physical: +4.4 [95% CI, 2.6-6.3]) and effect size statistics with moderate change (Cohen
conclusionThere is no statistical difference in internal or external responsiveness to change among the EQ-5D, VR-12 physical, and PROMIS 10 physical instruments. In tracking longitudinal patient health, researchers and administrators have the flexibility to choose any of the general PROs among the EQ-5D, VR-12 physical, and PROMIS 10 physical. We recommend that any study tracking PROs in knee arthroscopy include 1 of these generic instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.