Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28210537›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2017

Multilevel predictors of colorectal cancer testing modality among publicly and privately insured people turning 50.

Stephanie B Wheeler, Tzy-Mey Kuo, Anne Marie Meyer, Christa E Martens, Kristen M Hassmiller Lich, Florence K L Tangka, Lisa C Richardson, Ingrid J Hall, Judith Lee Smith, Maria E Mayorga and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Initiation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Enrollees.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie B WheelerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB#7411, McGavran Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7411, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, CB#7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295, United States; Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Airport Road, CB#7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, United States; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1700 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, CB#7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7426, United States.
Tzy-Mey KuoLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, CB#7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295, United States.
Anne Marie MeyerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, CB#7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295, United States; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB#7435, McGavran Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, United States.
Christa E MartensLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, CB#7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295, United States.
Kristen M Hassmiller LichDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB#7411, McGavran Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7411, United States.
Florence K L TangkaDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.
Lisa C RichardsonDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.
Ingrid J HallDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.
Judith Lee SmithDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States.
Maria E MayorgaDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7906, Raleigh, NC 27965-7906, United States.
Paul BrownUniversity of California at Merced, SSM Building Room 308a, Merced, CA 95343, United States.
Trisha M CrutchfieldCecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Airport Road, CB#7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, United States; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1700 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, CB#7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7426, United States.
Michael P PignoneLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, CB#7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295, United States; Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Airport Road, CB#7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, United States; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1700 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, CB#7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7426, United States; Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of California, Merced · US

Funding

North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Center for Health Promotion and Disease PreventionU48DP005017 · DP · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AMMERMAN, ALICE S, WHEELER, STEPHANIE BROOKE · 2014 to 2018
$10.9M
Training ProgramU54CA153602 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GODLEY, PAUL A. · 2010 to 2015
$5.4M
Improving Cancer-Related Patient Decision MakingK05CA129166 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PIGNONE, MICHAEL P · 2008 to 2012
$765k
ACL HHS U48DP005017AHRQ HHS K12 HS019468NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005017NCI NIH HHS K05 CA129166NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding multilevel predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test modality can help inform screening program design and implementation. We used North Carolina Medicare, Medicaid, and private, commercially available, health plan insurance claims data from 2003 to 2008 to ascertain CRC test modality among people who received CRC screening around their 50th birthday, when guidelines recommend that screening should commence for normal risk individuals. We ascertained receipt of colonoscopy, fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) from billing codes. Person-level and county-level contextual variables were included in multilevel random intercepts models to understand predictors of CRC test modality, stratified by insurance type. Of 12,570 publicly-insured persons turning 50 during the study period who received CRC testing, 57% received colonoscopy, whereas 43% received FOBT/FIT, with significant regional variation. In multivariable models, females with public insurance had lower odds of colonoscopy than males (odds ratio [OR] = 0.68; p < 0.05). Of 56,151 privately-insured persons turning 50 years old who received CRC testing, 42% received colonoscopy, whereas 58% received FOBT/FIT, with significant regional variation. In multivariable models, females with private insurance had lower odds of colonoscopy than males (OR = 0.43; p < 0.05). People living 10-15 miles away from endoscopy facilities also had lower odds of colonoscopy than those living within 5 miles (OR = 0.91; p < 0.05). Both colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT are widely used in North Carolina among insured persons newly age-eligible for screening. The high level of FOBT/FIT use among privately insured persons and women suggests that renewed emphasis on FOBT/FIT as a viable screening alternative to colonoscopy may be important.

Indexed as

Cancer screening testsColonoscopyColorectal cancerFecal occult blood testMedicaidMedicareMultilevel analysis

Identifiers

PMID28210537
PMCPMC5300695
OpenAlexW2560770787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.