Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28210479›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2016

Pregnant after assisted reproduction: a risk pregnancy is born! 18-years perinatal outcome results from a population-based registry in Flanders, Belgium.

W Ombelet, G Martens, L Bruckers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Impact of contraception and IVF hormones on metabolic, endocrine, and inflammatory status.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020 · on this map
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W OmbeletGenk Institute for Fertility Technology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, Hasselt, Belgium.
G MartensSPE (Study Center for Perinatal Epidemiology), Brussels, Belgium.
L BruckersCenter for Statistics (CENSTAT), Agoralaan building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Hasselt University · BETotal (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the increased risk for perinatal morbidity and mortality of babies born after ART is largely attributed to a higher rate of multiple gestations, a significantly worse perinatal outcome for singleton pregnancies following ART compared to pregnancies after natural conception has been reported as well. Most studies only include IVF/ICSI pregnancies; studies describing the perinatal outcome of pregnancies after non-IVF assisted reproduction are scarce. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Population-based cohort study with three exposure groups: a study group of pregnancies (1) after ovarian stimulation (OS), with or without artificial insemination (AI), (2) after IFV or ICSI and (3) a naturally conceived (NC) comparison group. Data from the regional registry of all hospital deliveries in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium during an 18-years period from January 1993 until December 2010 were used. The perinatal outcome parameters were prematurity, low birth weight, perinatal mortality and morbidity including neonatal intracranial bleeding and need for intubation. Logistic regression analysis was used including mode of conception, female age, foetal sex, parity and year of delivery.

resultsData on 1 079 814 births were studied: 1 039 415 singletons (19 896 IVF/ICSI, 20 469 OS and 999 050 NC) and 39 041 twins (9 353 IVF/ICSI, 4812 OS and 24 876 NC) were available for analysis. IVF/ICSI singletons had a significantly worse outcome when compared to OS and NC for almost all investigated perinatal parameters. Non-IVF/OS singletons were also significantly disadvantaged for prematurity and low birth weight when compared to NC. The outcome of twin pregnancies was similar for the three groups unless only unlike-sex twins were studied separately. Among this subgroup, IVF/ICSI carried a higher risk for low birth weight when compared to NC. OS unlike-sex twins were at increased risk for low birth weight, intra uterine death and perinatal mortality when compared to NC.

conclusionAccording to our results all ART pregnancies, whether due to IVF/ICSI or non-IVF treatment, have to be considered as risk pregnancies, irrespective of the number of foetuses. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY: Although our logistic regression analysis included co-variables with a potential impact on perinatal outcome such as mode of conception, female age, foetal sex, parity and year of delivery, we couldn't correct for other prominent confounders such as the use of fresh or frozen embryos, use of homologous or donor gametes, smoking, obesity, socio-economic status, occupation exposures and pre-existing disease.

Indexed as

ARTassisted reproductionICSIIUIIVFperinatal outcomepregnancypregnancy outcomesingletontwin

Identifiers

PMID28210479
PMCPMC5303697
OpenAlexW2918679905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.