ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2017
Low Prevalence of Clinically Significant Endoscopic Findings in Outpatients with Dyspepsia.
Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Related to Abnormal Endoscopic and Histologic Findings on Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Children.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2025Article
- Yield of alarm features in predicting significant endoscopic findings among hospitalized patients with dyspepsia.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Analysis between symptoms of the upper gastrointestinal tract and endoscopic findings of patients undergoing upper digestive endoscopy in a reference center in the interior of Maranhão, Brazil.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2024Observational
- Gastroscopy for dyspepsia: Understanding primary care and gastroenterologist mental models of practice: A cognitive task analysis approach.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients attending a UK centre with symptoms compatible with Rome IV functional dyspepsia.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Article
- Do Low-Risk Patients With Dyspepsia Need a Gastroscopy? Use of Gastroscopy for Otherwise Healthy Patients With Dyspepsia.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Diagnostic value of endoscopy in adult patients with dyspepsia.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2022Article
- Article
- Design characteristics of comparative effectiveness trials for the relief of symptomatic dyspepsia: A systematic review.Integrative medicine research · 2021Review
- Clinically significant endoscopic findings in patients of dyspepsia with no warning symptoms: A cross-sectional study.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Article
- Endoscopic Findings in Patients With Uninvestigated Dyspepsia: A Retrospective Study From Qatar.Cureus · 2020Article
- Guideline Adherence in Dyspepsia Investigation and Treatment.Kansas journal of medicine · 2020Article
- Gastritis Stages in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Dyspeptic Twins.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Article
- Use of alarm features in predicting significant endoscopic findings in Nigerian patients with dyspepsia.The Pan African medical journal · 2019Article
- Clinically significant endoscopic findings in a dyspeptic rural population cohort of Sindh, Pakistan: Are we over-investigating?Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.