Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28210087›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2017

Prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with stage III and IV colorectal cancer.

Jae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jae Hyun KimJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.
Jun Yeop LeeJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.
Hae Koo KimJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.
Jin Wook LeeJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.
Sung Gyu JungJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.
Kyoungwon JungJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.
Sung Eun KimJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.
Won MoonJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.
Moo In ParkJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.
Seun Ja ParkJae Hyun Kim, Jun Yeop Lee, Hae Koo Kim, Jin Wook Lee, Sung Gyu Jung, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-702, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

methodsBetween April 1996 and December 2010, medical records from a total of 1868 patients with CRC were retrospectively reviewed. The values of simple inflammatory markers including NLR and PLR in predicting the long-term outcomes of these patients were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.

resultsThe median follow-up duration was 46 mo (interquartile range, 22-73). The estimation of NLR and PLR was based on the time of diagnosis. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, high NLR (≥ 3.0) and high PLR (≥ 160) were independent risk factors predicting poor long-term outcomes in patients with stage III and IV CRC. However, high NLR and high PLR were not prognostic factors in patients with stage I and II CRC.

conclusionIn this study, we identified that high NLR (≥ 3.0) and high PLR (≥ 160) are useful prognostic factors to predict long-term outcomes in patients with stage III and IV CRC.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsLymphocytesNeutrophilsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorColorectal cancerLymphocyteNeutrophilPlateletPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID28210087
PMCPMC5291856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.