Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28210082›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2017

Multitarget stool DNA tests increases colorectal cancer screening among previously noncompliant Medicare patients.

Mark Prince, Lynn Lester, Rupal Chiniwala, Barry Berger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Network approach in liquidomics landscape.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Circulating tumour DNA - looking beyond the blood.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  16. Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark PrinceMark Prince, USMD Health System, Arlington, TX 76017, United States.
Lynn LesterMark Prince, USMD Health System, Arlington, TX 76017, United States.
Rupal ChiniwalaMark Prince, USMD Health System, Arlington, TX 76017, United States.
Barry BergerMark Prince, USMD Health System, Arlington, TX 76017, United States.
Military Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the uptake of noninvasive multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) in a cohort of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening non-compliant average-risk Medicare patients.

methodsThis cross sectional primary care office-based study examined mt-sDNA uptake in routine clinical practice among 393 colorectal cancer screening non-compliant Medicare patients ages 50-85 ordered by 77 physicians in a multispecialty group practice (USMD Physician Services, Dallas, TX) from October, 2014-September, 2015. Investigators performed a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant retrospective review of electronic health records to identify mt-sDNA use in patients who were either > 10 years since last colonoscopy and/or > 1 year since last fecal occult blood test. Test positive patients were advised to get diagnostic colonoscopy and thereafter patients were characterized by the most clinically significant lesion documented on histopathology of biopsies or excisional tissue. Descriptive statistics were employed. Key outcome measures included mt-sDNA compliance and diagnostic colonoscopy compliance on positive cases.

resultsOver 12 mo, 77 providers ordered 393 mt-sDNA studies with 347 completed (88.3% compliance). Patient mean age was 69.8 (50-85) and patients were 64% female. Mt-sDNA was negative in 85.3% (296/347) and positive in 14.7% (51/347). Follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 49 positive patients (96.1% colonoscopy compliance) with two patients lost to follow up. Index findings included: colon cancer (4/49, 8.2%), advanced adenomas (21/49, 42.9%), non-advanced adenomas (15/49, 30.6%), and negative results (9/49, 18.4%). The positive predictive value for advanced colorectal lesions was 51.0% and for any colorectal neoplasia was 81.6%. The mean age of patients with colorectal cancer was 70.3 and all CRC's were localized Stage I (2) and Stage II (2), three were located in the proximal colon and one was located in the distal colon.

conclusionMt-sDNA provided medical benefit to screening noncompliant Medicare population. High compliance with mt-sDNA and subsequent follow-up diagnostic colonoscopy identified patients with clinically critical advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, NeoplasmEarly Detection of CancerFecesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMedicareMiddle AgedOccult BloodPatient ComplianceDNA, NeoplasmAdvanced adenomaColonoscopyColorectal cancer screeningMultitarget stool DNAPreventiveScreening compliance

Identifiers

PMID28210082
PMCPMC5291851
OpenAlexW2586662604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.