ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2017
Multitarget stool DNA tests increases colorectal cancer screening among previously noncompliant Medicare patients.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increasing colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native peoples living in remote areas of Alaska: a multitarget stool DNA cluster randomized controlled trial.BMC primary care · 2026Trial
- Factors Associated with Advanced Adenoma Detection by Colonoscopy After Negative Multitarget Stool DNA Testing.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Observational
- Improving Colorectal Screening Compliance Through Targeted Quality Improvement Interventions in Primary Care.Cureus · 2025Article
- Association Between Spanish-Language Patient Navigation and Adherence to Multi-Target Stool DNA Testing Among Spanish-Speaking Patients at Sanitas Medical Center.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Adherence to multi-target stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening in the United States.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing the Choice Between Multi-Target Stool DNA and Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Alaska Native Peoples.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Estimated proportion of cancer deaths not addressed by current cancer screening efforts in the United States.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Article
- Clinical Validation of a Cell-Free DNA Fragmentome Assay for Augmentation of Lung Cancer Early Detection.Cancer discovery · 2024Article
- Diagnostic value of methylated branched chain amino acid transaminase 1/IKAROS family zinc finger 1 for colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Network approach in liquidomics landscape.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023Review
- Inappropriate Multi-Target Stool DNA Use for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Risks, Compliance, and Outcomes.Cureus · 2023Article
- Positive Predictive Value for Multitarget Stool DNA After Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery.Gastro hep advances · 2023Article
- Development of a colorectal cancer screening intervention for Alaska Native people during a pandemic year.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- Circulating tumour DNA - looking beyond the blood.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Cross-sectional adherence with the multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening in a large, nationally insured cohort.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
- Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021Article
- Cross-sectional adherence with the multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening: Real-world data from a large cohort of older adults.Journal of medical screening · 2021Article
- Epigenetic Alterations in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Current and Emerging Use for Biomarkers of Cancer.Gastroenterology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine the uptake of noninvasive multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) in a cohort of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening non-compliant average-risk Medicare patients.
methodsThis cross sectional primary care office-based study examined mt-sDNA uptake in routine clinical practice among 393 colorectal cancer screening non-compliant Medicare patients ages 50-85 ordered by 77 physicians in a multispecialty group practice (USMD Physician Services, Dallas, TX) from October, 2014-September, 2015. Investigators performed a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant retrospective review of electronic health records to identify mt-sDNA use in patients who were either > 10 years since last colonoscopy and/or > 1 year since last fecal occult blood test. Test positive patients were advised to get diagnostic colonoscopy and thereafter patients were characterized by the most clinically significant lesion documented on histopathology of biopsies or excisional tissue. Descriptive statistics were employed. Key outcome measures included mt-sDNA compliance and diagnostic colonoscopy compliance on positive cases.
resultsOver 12 mo, 77 providers ordered 393 mt-sDNA studies with 347 completed (88.3% compliance). Patient mean age was 69.8 (50-85) and patients were 64% female. Mt-sDNA was negative in 85.3% (296/347) and positive in 14.7% (51/347). Follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 49 positive patients (96.1% colonoscopy compliance) with two patients lost to follow up. Index findings included: colon cancer (4/49, 8.2%), advanced adenomas (21/49, 42.9%), non-advanced adenomas (15/49, 30.6%), and negative results (9/49, 18.4%). The positive predictive value for advanced colorectal lesions was 51.0% and for any colorectal neoplasia was 81.6%. The mean age of patients with colorectal cancer was 70.3 and all CRC's were localized Stage I (2) and Stage II (2), three were located in the proximal colon and one was located in the distal colon.
conclusionMt-sDNA provided medical benefit to screening noncompliant Medicare population. High compliance with mt-sDNA and subsequent follow-up diagnostic colonoscopy identified patients with clinically critical advanced colorectal neoplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.