Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28209296›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2017

Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

Robert Glynne-Jones, David Sebag-Montefiore, Helen M Meadows, David Cunningham, Rubina Begum, Fawzi Adab, Kim Benstead, Robert J Harte, Jill Stewart, Sandy Beare and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 72 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for anal cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Treatment of Anal Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Anal Carcinoma, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Perception of cure and quality of life in anal cancer survivors.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Robert Glynne-JonesMount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: rob.glynnejones@nhs.net.
David Sebag-MontefioreUniversity of Leeds, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK.
Helen M MeadowsCancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
David CunninghamRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Rubina BegumCancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Fawzi AdabNorth Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, Stoke, UK.
Kim BensteadCheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.
Robert J HarteBelfast City Hospital Cancer Centre, Belfast, UK.
Jill StewartNorthampton General Hospital, Northampton, UK.
Sandy BeareCancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Allan HackshawCancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Latha KadalayilFaculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
ACT II study group

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15953Cancer Research UK 19121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6-12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy.

methodsThe previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m

findingsWe enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3 was 83% (95% CI 79-86), 84% (81-87), and 87% (84-89), respectively and was 72% (66-78), 59% (49-67), and 46% (37-55) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3, respectively. In the subgroup of 691 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3 was 85% (81-88), 86% (82-88), and 87% (84-90), respectively, and was 75% (68-80), 61% (50-70), and 48% (36-58) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival in both the overall trial population and the subgroup was longer in patients who had a complete clinical response, compared with patients who did not have a complete clinical response, at all three assessments.

interpretationMany patients who do not have a complete clinical response when assessed at 11 weeks after commencing chemoradiotherapy do in fact respond by 26 weeks, and the earlier assessment could lead to some patients having unnecessary surgery. Our data suggests that the optimum time for assessment of complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is 26 weeks from starting chemoradiotherapy. We suggest that guidelines should be revised to indicate that later assessment is acceptable.

fundingCancer Research UK.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAnus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCisplatinDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitomycinNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingCisplatinFluorouracilMitomycin

Identifiers

PMID28209296
PMCPMC5337624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.