Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28209161›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

What support is needed to self-manage a rheumatic disorder: a qualitative study.

Janet M J Been-Dahmen, Margot J Walter, Jolanda Dwarswaard, Johanna M W Hazes, AnneLoes van Staa, Erwin Ista

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aspects of exercise with person-centred guidance influencing the transition to independent exercise: a qualitative interview study among older adults with rheumatoid arthritis.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janet M J Been-DahmenResearch Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rochussenstraat 198, P.O. Box 25035, 3001, HA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.m.j.been-dahmen@hr.nl.
Margot J WalterRheumatology Department, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jolanda DwarswaardResearch Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rochussenstraat 198, P.O. Box 25035, 3001, HA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johanna M W HazesRheumatology Department, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
AnneLoes van StaaResearch Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rochussenstraat 198, P.O. Box 25035, 3001, HA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin IstaIntensive Care Unit, Erasmus MC University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, P.O. Box 1738, 3000, DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLRotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToday, patients are expected to take an active role in the form of self-management. Given the burden of a rheumatic disorder, the patients cannot be expected to self-manage on their own. In order to develop self-management interventions that fit patients' needs and preferences, it is essential to examine patients' perspective on how support can be optimized. This study aimed to identify support needs of outpatients with rheumatic disorders and preferences for who should provide self-management support.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted using focus groups and individual interviews with outpatients with rheumatic disorders treated in a Dutch university hospital. Interview data was analysed with Directed Content Analysis and coded with predetermined codes derived from our model about support needs of chronically ill patients. This model distinguished three types of support: instrumental, psychosocial and relational support.

resultsFourteen patients participated in two focus group interviews and six were interviewed individually. Most patients preferred an active role in self-management. Nonetheless, they notably needed support in developing skills for self-managing their rheumatic disorder in daily life. The extent of support needs was influenced by disease stage, presence of symptoms and changes in one's situation. A trusted relationship and partnership were conditional for receiving any kind of professional support. Patients wanted to be seen as experienced experts of living with a rheumatic disorder. Acquiring specific disease-related knowledge, learning how to deal with symptoms and fluctuations, talking about emotional aspects, and discussing daily life issues and disease-related information were identified as important elements of self-management support. It was considered crucial that support be tailored to individual needs and expertise. Professionals and relatives were preferred as support givers. Few patients desired support from fellow patients.

conclusionSelf-management was primarily seen as patient's own task. Above all, patients wanted to be seen as the experienced experts. Professionals' self-management support should be focused on coaching patients in developing problem-solving skills, for which practical tools and training are needed.

Indexed as

Rheumatic DiseasesSelf-ManagementSocial SupportAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientPatient perspectiveQualitative designRheumatic disorderSelf-management support

Identifiers

PMID28209161
PMCPMC5314679
OpenAlexW2588852670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.