Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28208764›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2017

Spatial Impairment and Memory in Genetic Disorders: Insights from Mouse Models.

Sang Ah Lee, Valter Tucci, Giorgio Vallortigara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sang Ah LeeCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto 38068, Italy. sangah.lee@unitn.it.
Valter TucciNeuroscience and Brain Technologies Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova 16163, Italy. valter.tucci@iit.it.
Giorgio VallortigaraCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto 38068, Italy. giorgio.vallortigara@unitn.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research across the cognitive and brain sciences has begun to elucidate some of the processes that guide navigation and spatial memory. Boundary geometry and featural landmarks are two distinct classes of environmental cues that have dissociable neural correlates in spatial representation and follow different patterns of learning. Consequently, spatial navigation depends both on the type of cue available and on the type of learning provided. We investigated this interaction between spatial representation and memory by administering two different tasks (working memory, reference memory) using two different environmental cues (rectangular geometry, striped landmark) in mouse models of human genetic disorders: Prader-Willi syndrome (

Indexed as

Beta-catenin geneboundary geometryfeaturenavigationPrader-Willispatial memory

Identifiers

PMID28208764
PMCPMC5332960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.