Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28207982›Full record

SynthesisWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2017

Understanding Ethical Issues of Research Participation From the Perspective of Participating Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Stacey Crane, Marion E Broome

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Antiemetic medications for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. A phase 2 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dose-finding study of oral NEPA for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Better Design, Better Engagement, Better Data: Adolescents' Insights for Improving Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Are Adolescents Sensitive About Sensitive Data? Exploring Student Concerns About Privacy, Confidentiality, and Data Use in Health Research.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stacey CranePredoctoral Fellow, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Marion E BroomeRuby F. Wilson Distinguished Professor and Dean, Vice-Chancellor for Nursing Affairs, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

INDIANA UNIVERSITY: TRAINING IN BEHAVIORAL NURSINGT32NR007066 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI RAWL, SUSAN M · 1990 to 2017
$4.2M
Parents' Experiences in Pediatric Oncology Phase 1 Clinical TrialsF31NR015393 · NINR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CRANE, STACEY · 2015 to 2017
$81k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR015393NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe past 20 years have seen distinct shifts in the way the participation of children and adolescents in research is viewed. This has been emphasized by the growing pediatric research enterprise. Additional information on children's and adolescents' experiences during research participation is needed to better inform researchers on the ethical conduct of research with this vulnerable population.

aimsThe objective of this analysis was to examine ethical issues in research with children and adolescents from their perspective as participants, including: assent, parental consent, risk perception, impact of research participation, and incentives.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted per the Long, Godfrey, Randall, Brettle, and Grant framework by means of an iterative searching process. Using the key words "research ethics" and "child or pediatric or adolescent," PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost databases were searched to identify articles. Limitations placed on the searches were: English language, year of publication between 2003 and 2014, humans, abstract available, and age birth-18 years.

findingsTwenty-three empiric studies were identified and formed the sample. Included studies represented a diverse range of areas of research, methods, settings, sample demographics, authors, and journals. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Even young children demonstrated the ability to understand essential elements of research, although there is variability in children's level of understanding. Trust was a significant contributing factor to children's and adolescents' participation in research, and also shaped their assessments of risk. Research participation was mainly beneficial for children and adolescents. Incentives were mainly viewed positively, although concerns of possible undue influence were expressed.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchPerceptionResearch SubjectsAdolescentChildHumansTrustadolescentassentchildconsentethicsincentiveparticipantparticipationresearchrisk

Identifiers

PMID28207982
PMCPMC5724520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.